ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2020
Dye binding assay reveals doxorubicin preference for DNA versus cardiolipin.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relevance of Ferroptosis to Cardiotoxicity Caused by Anthracyclines: Mechanisms to Target Treatments.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Understanding the Protective Role of Exosomes in Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Review
- Reconstituted HDL as a therapeutic delivery device.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is a potent anticancer agent that binds both DNA and cardiolipin (CL). To investigate DOX binding to CL versus DNA, aqueous soluble, CL-enriched nanoparticles, termed nanodisks (ND), were employed. Upon incubation with CL-ND, but not with phosphatidylcholine ND, DOX binding was detected. DOX binding to CL-ND was sensitive to buffer pH and ionic strength. To investigate if a DOX binding preference for DNA versus CL-ND exists, an agarose gel-based dye binding assay was developed. Under conditions wherein the commercial fluorescent dye, GelRed, detects a 636 bp DNA template following electrophoresis, DOX staining failed to visualize this DNA band. Incubation of the template DNA with DOX prior to electrophoresis resulted in a DOX concentration-dependent attenuation of GelRed staining intensity. When the template DNA was pre-incubated with equivalent amounts of free DOX or DOX-CL-ND, no differences in the extent of GelRed staining intensity attenuation were noted. When DOX was incubated with DNA alone, or a mixture of DNA and CL-ND, the extent of DOX-induced GelRed staining intensity attenuation was equivalent. Thus, DOX has a binding preference for DNA versus CL and, moreover, DOX-CL-ND offer a potential strategy to prevent DOX-induced cardiotoxicity while not affecting its affinity for DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.