Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32045426›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Spectroscopic Investigation of DCCH and FTSC as a potential pair for Förster Resonance Energy Transfer in different solvents.

Georg Urstöger, Andreas Steinegger, Robert Schennach, Ulrich Hirn

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georg UrstögerInstitute for Paper, Pulp and Fiber Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Andreas SteineggerInstitute of Analytical Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Robert SchennachCD-Laboratory for Fiber Swelling and Paper Performance, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-0030
Ulrich HirnInstitute for Paper, Pulp and Fiber Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1376-9076
Graz University of Technology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two molecules, 7-(diethylamino)coumarin-3-carbohydrazide (DCCH) and fluorescein-5-thiosemicarbazide (FTSC) were investigated in different solvents, under varying pH conditions regarding their spectroscopic properties for the usage as a Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) pair to study the molecular interaction between cellulosic surfaces. All the relevant spectroscopic properties to determine the Förster distance were measured and the performance as a FRET system was checked. From the results, it is clear that the environmental conditions need to be accurately controlled as both, but especially the FTSC dyes are sensitive to changes. For high enough concentrations positive FRET systems were observed in DMF, DMSO, H2O, THF and alkaline DMF. However due to the low quantum yield of the unmodified DCCH throughout the investigated parameter range and the strong environmental dependency of FTSC, both dyes are not preferable for being used in a FRET system for studying interaction between cellulosic surfaces.

Indexed as

CoumarinsEnergy TransferFluoresceinsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHydrazinesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSolventsSpectrometry, FluorescenceSpectrophotometry, UltravioletSpectrum Analysis7-diethylaminocoumarin-3-carbohydrazideCoumarinsFluoresceinsfluorescein thiosemicarbazideHydrazinesSolvents

Identifiers

PMID32045426
PMCPMC7012416
OpenAlexW3005548019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.