ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2020
Ability of the COPD Assessment Test to evaluate the lung-specific quality of life in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.
Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ability of the COPD Assessment Test to evaluate the lung-specific quality of life in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.The clinical respiratory journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is utilised to evaluate the treatment outcome regarding the health status in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). However, the ability of the CAT to evaluate the lung-specific quality of life in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is not established. Therefore, we investigated whether CAT scores can be used to evaluate SSc-ILD as they are for IIP.
methodsA total of 150 patients with IIP or SSc-ILD who were evaluated by the CAT were retrospectively assigned to this study. Clinical data at the visit for the CAT were analysed.
resultsThe forced vital capacity and distance walked during the 6-minute walk test (6MWD) were significantly correlated with the CAT score for SSc-ILD and IIP, and the CAT scores were similarly distributed in SSc-ILD and IIP. The CAT score of SSc-ILD patients was negatively affected by pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not by corticosteroids, which affected it in IIP patients. CAT scores of patients with either disease receiving home oxygen therapy were poor. In multiple regression analysis, pulmonary arterial hypertension and 6MWD were independent predictors for the CAT score in patients with SSc-ILD, while corticosteroid administration was selected as an independent factor in patients with IIP.
conclusionsOur study suggests that the CAT can be applied to evaluate the lung-specific quality of life in SSc-ILD similar to IIP regarding the pulmonary function, but it should be noted that pulmonary arterial hypertension in SSc-ILD influences the CAT score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.