Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32044753›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2020

Real-Time Access to Electronic Health Record via a Patient Portal: Is it Harmful? A Retrospective Observational Study.

Savannah Ir van Kuppenveld, Harmieke van Os-Medendorp, Nicole Am Tiemessen, Johannes Jm van Delden

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Savannah Ir van Kuppenveld *University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0920-4179
Harmieke van Os-MedendorpUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3300-2101
Nicole Am TiemessenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department Information Technology, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-3377
Johannes Jm van DeldenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5530-7275
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLSaxion · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid implementation of patient portals, through which patients can view their electronic health record, creates possibilities for information exchange and communication between patients and health care professionals. However, real-time disclosure of test results and clinical reports poses a source of concern.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine negative experiences resulting from real-time disclosure of medical information through a patient portal.

methodsData were collected over a 2-year period in 4 datasets consisting of incidents reported by health care professionals, complaints of patients, patient issues at a portal helpdesk, and a survey among health care professionals. Incidents, complaints, issues, and answers on the survey were counted and analyzed through an iterative process of coding.

resultsWithin the chosen time frame of 2 years, on average, 7978 patients per month logged into the portal at least once. The amount of negative incidents and complaints was limited. A total of 6 incidents, 4 complaints, and 2506 issues at the helpdesk concerning the patient portal were reported, of which only 2, 1, and 3 cases of these respective databases concerned real-time disclosure of medical information through the patient portal. Moreover, 32 out of 216 health care professionals reported patients that had negative experiences with real-time disclosure. Most negative consequences concerned confused and anxious patients when confronted with unexpected or incomprehensible results.

conclusionsReal-time access through a patient portal did not substantially result in negative consequences. The negative consequences that did occur can be mitigated by adequate preparation and instruction of patients concerning the various functionalities of the patient portal, real-time disclosure of test results in particular, and can also be managed through educating health care professionals about the patient portal and making adjustments in the daily practice of health care professionals.

Indexed as

AdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PortalsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcommunicationhealth services researchinformation technologypatient portals

Identifiers

PMID32044753
PMCPMC7055752
OpenAlexW2979976782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.