ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2020
Bacterial genetics and molecular pathogenesis in the age of high throughput DNA sequencing.
Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Detection Marker of Xanthomonas fragariae from Strawberry Plants Using SYBR Green Real-Time PCR.The plant pathology journal · 2026Article
- Neisseria subflava Type 6 Secretion System competition with bacterial and fungal species.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Unravelling bacterial virulence factors in yeast: From identification to the elucidation of their mechanisms of action.Archives of microbiology · 2024Review
- PathogenicJournal of bacteriology · 2024Review
- Research progress on detection techniques for point-of-care testing of foodborne pathogens.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Suppressor Mutants: History and Today's Applications.EcoSal Plus · 2021Review
- SorTn-seq: a high-throughput functional genomics approach to discovering regulators of bacterial gene expression.Nature protocols · 2021Article
- Analyzing Modern Biomolecules: The Revolution of Nucleic-Acid Sequencing - Review.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Current Challenges in Vaccinology.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When Stanley Falkow introduced Molecular Koch's Postulates (Falkow, 1988) as a conceptual framework to identify microbial factors that contributed to disease, he reaffirmed the prominent role that the basic principles of genetic analysis should play in defining genotype-phenotype associations in microbial pathogens. In classical bacterial genetics the nature of mutations is inferred through cis-trans complementation and by indirectly mapping their relative position and physical distance through recombination frequencies - all of which were made possible by the genetic tools of the day: natural transformations, conjugation and transduction. Unfortunately, many of these genetic tools are not always available to study pathogenic bacteria. The recombinant DNA revolution in the 1980s launched the field of molecular pathogenesis as genes could be treated as physical units that could be cut, spliced and transplanted from one microbe to another and thus not only 'prove' that an individual gene complemented a virulence defect in a mutant strain but also could impart pathogenic properties to otherwise benign microbes. The recombinant DNA revolution also enabled the generation of newer versions of genetic tools to generate mutations and engineer microbial genomes. The last decade has ushered in next generation sequencing technologies as a new powerful tool for bacterial genetics. The routine and inexpensive sequencing of microbial genomes has increased the number and phylogenetic scope of microbes that are amenable to functional characterization and experimentation. In this review, we highlight some salient advances in this rapidly evolving area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.