Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32044434›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Face-sensitive brain responses in the first year of life.

Stefania Conte, John E Richards, Maggie W Guy, Wanze Xie, Jane E Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neural Tracking of the Maternal Voice in the Infant Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Leader-follower dynamics during early social interactions matter for infant word learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefania ConteDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, United States. Electronic address: contes@mailbox.sc.edu.
John E RichardsDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, United States.
Maggie W GuyDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, United States.
Wanze XieLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Jane E RobertsDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, United States.

Funding

Supplement to The Emergence and Stability of Autism in Fragile X SyndromeR01MH090194 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI ROBERTS, JANE E · 2011 to 2020
$5.4M
The Development of Sustained Attention in InfantsR37HD018942 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RICHARDS, JOHN E · 2007 to 2016
$4.5M
The development of sustained attention in infantsR01HD018942 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RICHARDS, JOHN E · 1988 to 2021
$4.2M
The Neurodevelopmental MRI DatabaseR03HD091464 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RICHARDS, JOHN E · 2017 to 2018
$128k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD018942NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD091464NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD018942NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH090194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical areas in the ventral visual pathway become selectively tuned towards the processing of faces compared to non-face stimuli beginning around 3 months of age and continuing over the first year. Studies using event-related potentials in the EEG (ERPs) have found an ERP component, the N290, that displays specificity for human faces. Other components, such as the P1, P400, and Nc have been studied to a lesser degree in their responsiveness to human faces. However, little is known about the systematic changes in the neural responses to faces during the first year of life, and the localization of these responses in infants' brain. We examined ERP responses to pictures of faces and objects in infants from 4.5 months through 12 months in a cross-sectional study. We investigated the activity of all the components reported to be involved in infant face processing, with particular interest to their amplitude variation and cortical localization. We identified neural regions responsible for the component through the application of cortical source localization methods. We found larger P1 and N290 responses to faces than objects, and these components were localized in the lingual and middle/posterior fusiform gyri, respectively. The amplitude of the P400 was not differentially sensitive to faces over objects. The Nc component was different for faces and objects, was influenced by the infant's attentional state, and localized in medial-anterior brain areas. The implications of these results are discussed in the identification of developmental ERP precursors to face processing.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAttentionCerebral CortexChild DevelopmentCross-Sectional StudiesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansInfantMalePattern Recognition, VisualTemporal LobeVisual CortexAttentionEvent-related potentialsFace processingInfancy

Identifiers

PMID32044434
PMCPMC7085434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.