ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2021
An Active Inference Approach to Dissecting Reasons for Nonadherence to Antidepressants.
Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and solutions to the adoption of translational tools for computational psychiatry.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- Reward Maximization Through Discrete Active Inference.Neural computation · 2023Article
- Invasive Computational Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry · 2023Review
- A cultural-ecosocial systems view for psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Lifeworlds in pain: a principled method for investigation and intervention.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023Review
- A step-by-step tutorial on active inference and its application to empirical data.Journal of mathematical psychology · 2022Article
- From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology.Review of philosophy and psychology · 2022Article
- Simulating the computational mechanisms of cognitive and behavioral psychotherapeutic interventions: insights from active inference.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntidepressant medication adherence is among the most important problems in health care worldwide. Interventions designed to increase adherence have largely failed, pointing toward a critical need to better understand the underlying decision-making processes that contribute to adherence. A computational decision-making model that integrates empirical data with a fundamental action selection principle could be pragmatically useful in 1) making individual-level predictions about adherence and 2) providing an explanatory framework that improves our understanding of nonadherence.
methodsHere we formulated a partially observable Markov decision process model based on the active inference framework that can simulate several processes that plausibly influence adherence decisions.
resultsUsing model simulations of the day-to-day decisions to take a prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, we show that several distinct parameters in the model can influence adherence decisions in predictable ways. These parameters include differences in policy depth (i.e., how far into the future one considers when deciding), decision uncertainty, beliefs about the predictability (stochasticity) of symptoms, beliefs about the magnitude and time course of symptom reductions and side effects, and strength of medication-taking habits that one has acquired.
conclusionsClarifying these influential factors will be an important first step toward empirically determining which factors are contributing to nonadherence to antidepressants in individual patients. The model can also be seamlessly extended to simulate adherence to other medications (by incorporating the known symptom reduction and side effect trajectories of those medications), with the potential promise of identifying which treatments may be best suited for different patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.