Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32044108›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2020

CCNE1 and BRD4 co-amplification in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Shariska Petersen, Andrew J Wilson, Jeff Hirst, Katherine F Roby, Oluwole Fadare, Marta A Crispens, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Dineo Khabele

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PROTACs in Ovarian Cancer: Current Advancements and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shariska PetersenDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.
Andrew J WilsonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Jeff HirstDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.
Katherine F RobyDepartment of Anatomy & Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America; The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.
Oluwole FadareDepartment of Pathology, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Marta A CrispensVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Alicia Beeghly-FadielVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Dineo KhabeleDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America; The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America. Electronic address: dkhabele@kumc.edu.
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · USUniversity of San Diego · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002368 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jennifer Lynn Goldman, NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
Functional Proteomics by Reverse Phase Protein Array in CancerR50CA221675 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LU, YILING · 2017 to 2021
$726k
Minimizing Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults: a motor learning approachR21AG073892 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SOSNOFF, JACOB J. · 2021 to 2022
$429k
Targeting Cyclin E in Ovarian Cancer with Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsR21CA210210 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KHABELE, DINEO · 2017 to 2018
$384k
Leica Bond RXS10OD023475 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOYD, KELLI L. · 2018 to 2018
$213k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002368NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS R21 CA210210NCI NIH HHS R50 CA221675NIA NIH HHS R21 AG073892NIH HHS S10 OD023475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and lethal histological subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. HGSOC with cyclin E1 gene (CCNE1) amplification and bromodomain and extraterminal 4 (BRD4) amplification have been associated with poor outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate clinical outcomes of HGSOC with co-amplification of CCNE1 and BRD4 and high protein expression of cyclin E and BRD4.

methodsCopy number amplification data were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for 579 HGSOC. Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) TCGA data were used to determine cyclin E and BRD4 protein expression in 482 HGSOC. Cyclin E and BRD4 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was evaluated in a tissue microarray (TMA) of 110 HGSOC. Measured clinical outcomes were survival and platinum sensitivity.

resultsOf 30% of HGSOC with amplifications in CCNE1 or BRD4, 8% have both CCNE1 and BRD4 amplification. Protein expression of cyclin E and BRD4 are positively correlated, both by RPPA (r = 0.23; p < 0.001) and by IHC (r = 0.21; p = 0.025). Patients with CCNE1 and BRD4 co-amplified HGSOC have worse overall survival than patients without amplifications, 39.94 vs 48.06 months (p = 0.029). High protein expression of cyclin E, but not BRD4, was associated with poor overall survival (HR 1.62, 1.04-2.53, p = 0.033) and platinum resistance (p = 0.016).

conclusionHGSOC with CCNE1 and BRD4 co-amplification are associated with poor overall survival. Further studies are warranted to determine the use of protein expression by IHC as a surrogate marker for CCNE1 and BRD4 co-amplified HGSOC.

Indexed as

Bromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCyclinsCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleGene AmplificationHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsProtein Array AnalysisTissue Array AnalysisTranscription FactorsBRD4 protein, humanBromodomain Containing ProteinsCCNE2 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCyclinsTranscription FactorsBRD4CCNE1Cyclin EHigh-grade serous ovarian cancerHomologous recombination proficient

Identifiers

PMID32044108
PMCPMC7217738
OpenAlexW3004779459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.