Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043787›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

ONKOTEV Score as a Predictive Tool for Thromboembolic Events in Pancreatic Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis.

João Godinho, Mafalda Casa-Nova, João Moreira-Pinto, Pedro Simões, Francisco Paralta Branco, Luísa Leal-Costa, Ana Faria, Fábio Lopes, José Alberto Teixeira, José Luís Passos-Coelho

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Unmet Needs and Challenges in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Primary ambulatory thromboprophylaxis in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy: hope or hype?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  14. Predictors for thromboembolism in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João GodinhoHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2411-3993
Mafalda Casa-NovaHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
João Moreira-PintoHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
Pedro SimõesHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
Francisco Paralta BrancoHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
Luísa Leal-CostaHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
Ana FariaHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
Fábio LopesHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
José Alberto TeixeiraHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
José Luís Passos-CoelhoHospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.
Hospital Beatriz Ângelo · PTHospital da Luz · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients with cancer and causes considerable morbidity and mortality. The risk of VTE is higher in patients with pancreatic cancer and is often associated with treatment delays or interruptions. Recently, the ONKOTEV score was proposed as a VTE risk predictor model for patients with cancer, but its validation is still ongoing. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study to determine the incidence of VTE and to evaluate the ONKOTEV score as a VTE predictive tool in a population of patients with pancreatic cancer.

resultsBetween February 2012 and May 2017, 165 patients were included in the study. The median age was 73 years, 45.5% of patients were female, and 55.8% had stage IV disease. Fifty-one patients had a VTE (30.9%); 23.5% had pulmonary embolism, 25.5% had deep venous thrombosis, and 51.0% had visceral VTE (VsT). At a median follow-up time of 6.3 months, cumulative incidence of VTE was less than 10% for ONKOTEV scores 0 or 1 and approximately 40% and 70% for scores 2 and ≥3, respectively.

conclusionThe high VTE incidence observed in this study is consistent with prior reports. Patients at high risk for VTE with no increase in hemorrhagic risk should be considered for primary thromboprophylaxis. The ONKOTEV score may stratify VTE risk in patients with pancreatic cancer, with ONKOTEV score ≥2 being associated with a higher VTE occurrence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of patients with pancreatic cancer and causes considerable morbidity, treatment delays or interruptions, and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis is not used routinely in ambulatory patients. Tools to stratify the risk of VTE are important to help select patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Recently, the ONKOTEV score was proposed as a VTE risk predictor model for patients with cancer, but its validation is still ongoing. In this patient series, ONKOTEV score ≥2 was associated with high VTE occurrence and may stratify VTE risk in patients with pancreatic cancer, suggesting that ONKOTEV can be considered to select patients with pancreatic cancer for primary thromboprophylaxis.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsVenous ThromboembolismAgedAnticoagulantsFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsONKOTEVPancreatic cancerRisk predictionVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID32043787
PMCPMC7011666
OpenAlexW2982101665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.