Trial reportThe oncologist2020
Impact of Baseline Nutrition and Exercise Status on Toxicity and Outcomes in Phase I and II Oncology Clinical Trial Participants.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07231120 (A Phase I Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic Characteristics, and Preliminary Efficacy of SXRN Injection in Patients With Cancer Cachexia), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic Characteristics, and Preliminary Efficacy of SXRN Injection in Patients With Cancer Cachexia
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional status, body composition and chemotherapy dosing in children and young people with cancer: a systematic review by the SIOP nutrition network.British journal of cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Sarcopenia and risk of postoperative pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2025Pooled it
- Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of COVID-19 on early identification of protein-energy malnutrition in the cancer care setting: a repeated cross-sectional survey of cancer care professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Use of supportive care services and advance care planning among early phase oncology clinical trial participants.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Feasibility of using Simple Diet Self-Assessment Tool (SDSAT) to explore patterns of dietary intake for patients undergoing chemotherapy.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Food Insecurity and Clinical Biomarkers of Inflammation among Cancer Survivors in the All of Us Research Program.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Association of CVAI, LAP and SMI with risk of haematological toxicity after immunochemotherapy in patients with DLBCL: a retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Article
- The Importance of Nutrition in Cancer Care: A Narrative Review.Current nutrition reports · 2024Review
- Food Insecurity and Dietary Quality in African American Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Exploratory Study.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Adverse postoperative outcomes in elderly patients with sarcopenia.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Cachexia index as a prognostic predictor after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetics of cancer therapeutics and energy balance: the role of diet intake, energy expenditure, and body composition.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023Review
- Nutrition care is an integral part of patient-centred medical care: a European consensus.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Article
- Comparison of surgical complications after curative surgery in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and sarcopenia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Article
- Prevalence of Food Insecurity Among Cancer Survivors in the United States: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2023Article
- Effect of combined therapies including nutrition and physical exercise in advanced cancer patients: A pooled analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Significant impact of cachexia index on the outcomes after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalnutrition and physical inactivity are common in patients with advanced cancer and are associated with poor outcomes. There are increasing data that altered body composition is related to the pharmacokinetic properties of cancer therapies. These adverse conditions may impact outcomes in early-phase oncology clinical trials. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe aimed to understand the relationships between baseline nutrition and exercise status with important trial endpoints including treatment-related toxicity and survival. Baseline assessments of nutrition and exercise status were conducted in patients prior to initiation of phase I and II oncology clinical trials. Patients were followed prospectively for the onset of adverse events. Tumor response and survival data were also obtained. Fisher's exact test and chi-square analysis were used to determine statistical significance. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare patient duration on study and survival.
resultsOne hundred patients were recruited, of whom 87 were initiating a phase I trial. Sixty percent were initiating trials studying immunotherapeutic agents. Critical malnutrition was found in 39% of patients, and 52% were sedentary. Patients who were malnourished had significantly increased rates of grade ≥ 3 toxicity (p = .001), hospitalizations (p = .001), and inferior disease control rate (p = .019). Six-month overall survival was significantly reduced in malnourished patients versus nonmalnourished patients (47% vs. 84%; p = .0003), as was median duration on study (48 days vs. 105 days; p = .047). Being sedentary at baseline was associated with decreased duration on study (57 days vs. 105 days; p = .019).
conclusionMalnutrition and sedentary lifestyle are highly prevalent in patients enrolling on early-phase oncology clinical trials and are associated with poor outcomes. The quality of data from these studies may be compromised as a result of these pre-existing conditions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Phase I and II trials are critical steps in the development of effective cancer therapeutics, yet only a small percentage of agents are ultimately approved for human cancer care. Despite increasing awareness of the interactions between malnutrition, sarcopenia, and treatment-related outcomes such as toxicity and response, these factors are not commonly incorporated into therapeutic decision making at the time of clinical trial consideration. Nutritional status and physical performance may be key biomarkers of mechanisms mediating treatment-related toxicity, dose modifications, risk of hospitalizations, and success of novel agents. This study advocates that a baseline nutritional assessment and early nutritional support may improve tolerability and response to experimental therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.