Observational studyThe oncologist2020
De Novo Versus Recurrent HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival from the SystHERs Registry.
Observational study in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01615068 (An Observational Cohort Study of Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients With HER2 Positive), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational Cohort Study of Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients With HER2 Positive (HER2+) Metastatic Breast Cancer (SystHERs Registry (Systemic Therapies for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Study)).
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Evidence of Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Docetaxel Combination as a First-Line Treatment for Korean Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Trial
- Trastuzumab deruxtecan plus pertuzumab in first-line HER2-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Impact of somatic PIK3CA mutations on clinical outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Advances in Targeting HER2 across Cancer Subtypes: A Pan-Tumor Approach.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Review
- Article
- Anti-HER2 plus endocrine therapy versus anti-HER2 plus chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- The role of dual-tracer PET imaging with ER and HER2 in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Characterizing cancer-related cognitive impairments and impact on quality of life in women with metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Analysis of survival differences in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment and Resistance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Attrition between lines of therapy and real-world outcomes of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Europe: a cohort study leveraging electronic medical records.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Observational
- Molecular and functional landscape of malignant serous effusions for precision oncology.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Subdivision of M1 category and prognostic stage for de novo metastatic breast cancer to enhance prognostic prediction and guide the selection of locoregional therapy.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Personalized treatment approach for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- A real-world study of treatment sequences and second-line clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in US community practice.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Management of patients with advanced-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: current evidence and future perspectives.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Patterns of distant metastasis and survival outcomes inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- De Novo Oligometastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited data exist describing real-world treatment of de novo and recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Systemic Therapies for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Study (SystHERs) was a fully enrolled (2012-2016), observational, prospective registry of patients with HER2-positive MBC. Patients aged ≥18 years and ≤6 months from HER2-positive MBC diagnosis were treated and assessed per their physician's standard practice. The primary endpoint was to characterize treatment patterns by de novo versus recurrent MBC status, compared descriptively. Secondary endpoints included patient characteristics, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] by Cox regression), and patient-reported outcomes.
resultsAmong 977 eligible patients, 49.8% (n = 487) had de novo and 50.2% (n = 490) had recurrent disease. A higher proportion of de novo patients had hormone receptor-negative disease (34.9% vs. 24.9%), bone metastasis (57.1% vs. 45.9%), and/or liver metastasis (41.9% vs. 33.1%), and a lower proportion had central nervous system metastasis (4.3% vs. 13.5%). De novo patients received first-line regimens containing chemotherapy (89.7%), trastuzumab (95.7%), and pertuzumab (77.8%) more commonly than recurrent patients (80.0%, 85.9%, and 68.6%, respectively). De novo patients had longer median PFS (17.7 vs. 11.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80; p < .0001) and OS (not estimable vs. 44.5 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69; p < .0001).
conclusionPatients with de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive MBC exhibit different disease characteristics and survival durations, suggesting these groups have distinct outcomes. These differences may affect future clinical trial design. Clinical trial identification number. NCT01615068 (clinicaltrials.gov). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: SystHERs was an observational registry of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which is a large, modern, real-world data set for this population and, thereby, provides a unique opportunity to study patients with de novo and recurrent HER2-positive MBC. In SystHERs, patients with de novo disease had different baseline demographics and disease characteristics, had superior clinical outcomes, and more commonly received first-line chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab versus those with recurrent disease. Data from this and other studies suggest that de novo and recurrent MBC have distinct outcomes, which may have implications for disease management strategies and future clinical study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.