Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043559›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020

Chronic Disease Decision Making and "What Matters Most".

Terri R Fried, Richard L Street, Andrew B Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Subjective-objective health literacy discrepancy, reduced healthcare utilization, and functional limitations associated with hearing loss.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Decision-making about dialysis: Beyond just dialysis or death.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Terri R FriedClinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-8083-8265
Richard L StreetDepartment of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Andrew B CohenDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Yale University · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise Esserman · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Enhancing Engagement in Advance Care PlanningR01NR016007 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED, TERRI R. · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
Dementia and Decision-Making for Older Adults without SurrogatesK76AG059987 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, ANDREW B · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059987NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of the question, "What matters most to you?" is a welcome development in the effort to provide patient-centered care. However, it is difficult for clinicians to translate answers to this question into treatment plans for chronic conditions, including recognizing when to consider options other than clinical practice guideline (CPG)-directed therapy. Goal elicitation is most helpful when a patient has different treatment options with clearly identifiable trade-offs. In the face of trade-offs, goal elicitation helps patients to prioritize among potentially competing outcomes. While decision aids (DAs) focus on trade-offs by delineating options and outcomes, the robust outcome data necessary to create DAs for older patients with multimorbidity are often lacking and even mild cognitive impairment makes the use of DAs difficult. The challenges for providing chronic disease care to older patients who are at risk for adverse events from CPG-directed therapy because of multimorbidity and/or frailty are to organize the complexity of individual combinations of diseases, conditions, and syndromes into common sets of trade-offs and to identify those goals or priorities that will directly inform a plan of care. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:474-477, 2020.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseDecision Making, SharedPatient-Centered CareAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth PrioritiesHumansMultimorbiditychronic diseaseoutcomesshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID32043559
PMCPMC7197748
OpenAlexW3006325657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.