Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043525›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2020

Sugar Feeding Patterns for Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes in South Texas.

Mark F Olson, Selene Garcia-Luna, Jose G Juarez, Estelle Martin, Laura C Harrington, Micky D Eubanks, Ismael E Badillo-Vargas, Gabriel L Hamer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The MosHouseInsects · 2022
    Article
  10. New tools for Aedes control: mass trapping.Current opinion in insect science · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cross-talk of insulin-like peptides, juvenile hormone, and 20-hydroxyecdysone in regulation of metabolism in the mosquitoProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark F OlsonDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Selene Garcia-LunaDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Jose G JuarezDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Estelle MartinDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Laura C HarringtonDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Micky D EubanksDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Ismael E Badillo-VargasDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Weslaco, TX.
Gabriel L HamerDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Texas A&M University · USCornell University · US

Funding

Social-ecological factors influencing receptivity to Zika virus and the efficacy of interventions in communities along the Texas-Mexico borderR21AI128953 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI HAMER, GABRIEL LEE · 2017 to 2018
$408k
NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000512NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI128953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective mosquito surveillance and management depend on a thorough understanding of the biology and feeding patterns unique to species and sex. Given that a propensity to sugar feed is necessary for some mosquito surveillance and newer control strategies, we sought to document the amount of total sugar in wild Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) captured from five different locations in the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) of South Texas over 2 yr. We used Biogents Sentinel 2 (BGS2) traps in year 1 and aspirators, BGS2, and CDC resting traps in years 2 and 3 to collect adult mosquitoes. The hot anthrone test was used to quantify total sugar content in each mosquito. Additionally, the cold and hot anthrone tests were used to distinguish fructose content from total sugars for mosquitoes captured in 2019. Overall, Ae. aegypti females had significantly lower total sugar content than Ae. aegypti males as well as both sexes of Cx. quinquefasciatus. However, the percentage of Ae. aegypti positive for fructose consumption was four to eightfold higher than Ae. aegypti previously reported in other regions. The difference between locations was significant for males of both species, but not for females. Seasonality and trapping method also revealed significant differences in sugar content of captured mosquitoes. Our results reinforce that sugar feeding in female Ae. aegypti is less than Cx. quinquefasciatus, although not absent. This study provides necessary data to evaluate the potential effectiveness of sugar baits in surveillance and control of both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsBody SizeCulexFeeding BehaviorFemaleMaleSeasonsSugarsTexasSugarsAedescollection methodCulexsugar-feedingsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32043525
PMCPMC7334892
OpenAlexW3006206298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.