Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043414›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurogenetics2020

Cellular and circuit mechanisms of olfactory associative learning in

Tamara Boto, Aaron Stahl, Seth M Tomchik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurogenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bioamine disruption leads to memory deficits in the whip spider, Phrynus marginemaculatus.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing circuit function in the developingFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Compromising Tyrosine Hydroxylase Function Extends and Blunts the Temporal Profile of Reinforcement by Dopamine Neurons inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognitive limits of larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Diverse memory paradigms inLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  12. Future avenues inLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sleep benefits different stages of memory inFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Anesthesia Resistant Memories in Drosophila, a Working Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tamara BotoDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Aaron StahlDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Seth M TomchikDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.

Funding

Mechanisms of Nf1 Pathophysiology Underlying HyperactivityR01NS097237 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI TOMCHIK, SETH M · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed significant progress in understanding how memories are encoded, from the molecular to the cellular and the circuit/systems levels. With a good compromise between brain complexity and behavioral sophistication, the fruit fly

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalDrosophila melanogasterLearningMemoryMushroom BodiesNeural PathwaysOlfactory PerceptiondopamineDrosophilageneticslearningmemorymushroom bodyneuronal circuitolfactory

Identifiers

PMID32043414
PMCPMC7147969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.