Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043310›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2020

US, EU, and Japanese Regulatory Guidelines for Development of Drugs for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: Implications for Global Drug Development.

Anne Vinther Morant, Henrik Tang Vestergaard, Anders Blaedel Lassen, Vaidrius Navikas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Memory Cells in Atopic Dermatitis: Paving the Way to Disease Modification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Vinther MorantRegulatory Science & Advocacy, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Tang VestergaardRegulatory Strategy, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders Blaedel LassenPatient Insights, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vaidrius NavikasMedical Affairs, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug development guidelines from regulatory authorities provide important information to sponsors on requirements for clinical evidence needed to support approval of new drugs. In the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD), recently published guidelines are available from EU, US, and Japanese regulatory authorities. In this review, these three guidelines are compared and discussed with emphasis on the recommendations provided for demonstration of efficacy in pivotal clinical trials conducted in predementia stages of AD. Similarities and differences are highlighted, and impact for global drug development is discussed in the context of the new International Conference on Harmonization E17 guideline on multiregional clinical trials. The AD field is characterized by significant challenges as, to date, no drug approval precedence exists in predementia AD despite numerous and ambitious efforts to slow the progression of the disease by pharmacologic intervention. Despite these uncertainties regulatory authorities across regions have blazed a trail for proactive multistakeholder collaboration, involvement, and continuous dialogue, setting a positive example on how to foster a supportive environment for development of new and meaningful treatments for patients with AD globally.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicAlzheimer DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentEuropean UnionHumansJapanMulticenter Studies as TopicResearch DesignUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID32043310
PMCPMC7359941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.