Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043268›Full record

ReviewLearning & behavior2020

Behavioral flexibility: A review, a model, and some exploratory tests.

Stephen E G Lea, Pizza K Y Chow, Lisa A Leaver, Ian P L McLaren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Learning & behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Parental control: ecology drives plasticity in parental response to offspring signals.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen E G LeaDepartment of Psychology, Washington Singer Laboratories, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. s.e.g.lea@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8498-4187
Pizza K Y ChowDepartment of Psychology, Washington Singer Laboratories, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Lisa A LeaverDepartment of Psychology, Washington Singer Laboratories, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Ian P L McLarenDepartment of Psychology, Washington Singer Laboratories, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aimed to explore and clarify the concept of behavioral flexibility. A selective literature review explored how the concept of behavioral flexibility has been used in ways that range from acknowledging the fact that animals' behavior is not always bounded by instinctual constraints, to describing the variation between species in their capacity for innovative foraging, a capacity that has repeatedly been linked to having a brain larger than would be predicted from body size. This wide range of usages of a single term has led to some conceptual confusion. We sought to find a more precise meaning for behavioral flexibility by representing it within a simple formal model of problem solving. The key to our model is to distinguish between an animal's state of knowledge about the world and its observable behavior, using a construct of response strength to represent that underlying knowledge. We modelled behavioral flexibility as a parameter in the function that transforms response strengths into observable response probabilities. We tested this model in simulations based on some recent experimental work on animal problem solving. Initial results showed that parametric manipulation can mimic some of the behavioral effects that have been attributed to flexibility.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalProblem SolvingAnimalsBrainCognitionAcquisitionCognitive ethologyComparative cognitionOperant conditioning

Identifiers

PMID32043268
PMCPMC7082303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.