Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The good, the bad, and the ugly.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A machine learning method integrating ECG and gated SPECT for cardiac resynchronization therapy decision support.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
   Article
2. Reproducibility of global LV function and dyssynchrony parameters derived from phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: A multicenter comparison with core laboratory setting.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
   Article
3. Clinical and gated SPECT MPI parameters associated with super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
   Article
4. Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as