ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2020
Intensive Outpatient Treatment (IOP) of Behavioral Health (BH) Problems: Engagement Factors Predicting Subsequent Service Utilization.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of factors associated with hospitalization in an outpatient population with mental health conditions: a case-control study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Reduction of Mental Health-Related Emergency Department Admissions for Youth and Young Adults Following a Remote Intensive Outpatient Program: Quality Improvement Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Understanding Treatment Needs of Youth in a Remote Intensive Outpatient Program Through Solicited Journals: Quality Improvement Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Treating Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults Using Remote Intensive Outpatient Programs: Quality Improvement Assessment.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to 1) better understand patterns of utilization of Intensive Outpatient Treatment (IOP) Programs and Services in the State of Connecticut by adult Medicaid recipients experiencing a serious mental illness, substance use disorder, or co-occurring disorders; and 2) to determine the relationship between the duration of an IOP episode and connection to care rates for higher (i.e., rehospitalization) or lower levels of care following discharge. We hypothesized that the duration of an IOP episode would impact positively in reducing the use of higher levels of care while increasing the use of lower levels of care. In order to examine the frequency and duration of use of Intensive Outpatient (IOP) services by the CT Medicaid population, a two-year timeframe was selected: July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2014. A survival analysis was conducted to assess the risk of readmission to an IOP within 180 days based on demographic and utilization factors including, Age (in years on date of discharge), Race and Ethnicity, Gender, Homeless Status (at least one day in CY 2013), and Engagement Group (Intent to Treat, Early Termination, Minimally Adequate Dosage, & Target or More). To better understand the patterns of utilization associated with Adult IOP services, the average length of stay, number of treatment days, and average number of treatment days per week were explored. The number of unique individuals who were part of this analysis is 11,473, of which 2050 were mental health IOP utilizers (18%), 4598 were co-occurring IOP utilizers (40%), and 4825 (42%) were substance use IOP utilizers. For the total population, the average length of stay (ALOS) in days was 42 and the average number of treatment days attended per week was 2.5, for an average of 15 treatment days per episode of care. Among the IOP Cohorts, the Mental Health Cohort had the longest ALOS at 44.15 days, an average of 2.34 days of service per week, for an average of 14.76 days of IOP service per episode of care. The Substance Use Cohort had the shortest ALOS at 41.33 days, but had the highest intensity of services per week at 2.71 for an average of 16 days of service per episode of care. The Co-Occurring Cohort presented an ALOS of 41.74 days, an average of 2.32 services per week and an average of 13.83 sessions per episode. Overall there is evidence supporting an association between the number of days of care and protection from hospitalization, up to a certain number of days of care or number of days in IOP. Above the Minimally Adequate Dosage, the IOP protection factor seems to reach a plateau. This means that after 16 days of care, the chances of hospitalization remain the same regardless of the additional days provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.