Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043139›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2020

Clinically Integrated Physical Therapist Practice in Cancer Care: A New Comprehensive Approach.

Christopher A Barnes, Nicole L Stout, Thomas K Varghese, Cornelia M Ulrich, Daniel R Couriel, Catherine J Lee, Christopher S Noren, Paul C LaStayo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Facilitators to the implementation of exercise into cancer care: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  4. The Use of Physiotherapy Navigators in Acute Cancer Care Settings: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Review
  5. Perceptions about oncological physiotherapy among health and social care professionals and cancer care managers: a co-design approach for implementation strategies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher A BarnesDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Nicole L StoutNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Bethesda, Maryland.
Thomas K VargheseHuntsman Cancer Institute, and School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah.
Cornelia M UlrichHuntsman Cancer Institute, and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah.
Daniel R CourielHuntsman Cancer Institute, and School of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, University of Utah.
Catherine J LeeHuntsman Cancer Institute, and School of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, University of Utah.
Christopher S NorenRehabilitation Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Paul C LaStayoDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, 520 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 (USA), and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah.

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Precision-exercise-prescription for Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: The PEP StudyR01CA211705 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI LASTAYO, PAUL C, ULRICH, CORNELIA M · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Best practice recommendations in cancer care increasingly call for integrated rehabilitation services to address physical impairments and disability. These recommendations have languished primarily due to a lack of pragmatic, generalizable intervention models. This perspective paper proposes a clinically integrated physical therapist (CI-PT) model that enables flexible and scalable services for screening, triage, and intervention addressing functional mobility. The model is based on (1) a CI-PT embedded in cancer care provider clinics, and (2) rehabilitation across the care continuum determined by the patient's level of functional mobility. The CI-PT model includes regular screening of functional mobility in provider clinics via a patient-reported mobility measure-the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, a brief physical therapy evaluation tailored to the specific functional needs of the individual-and a tailored, skilled physical therapist intervention based on functional level. The CI-PT model provides a pragmatic, barrier-free, patient-centric, data-driven approach to integrating rehabilitation as part of standard care for survivors of cancer. The model standardizes CI-PT practice and may be sufficiently agile to provide targeted interventions in widely varying cancer settings and populations. Therefore, it may be ideal for wide implementation among outpatient oncological settings. Implementation of this model requires a shared approach to care that includes physical therapists, rehabilitation administrators, cancer care providers, and cancer center administrators.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationCancer Care FacilitiesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansModels, TheoreticalMovement DisordersNeoplasmsPatient Care TeamPhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy SpecialtyPopulation SurveillanceTriage

Identifiers

PMID32043139
PMCPMC8204882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.