Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043136›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2020

New Horizons in the use of routine data for ageing research.

Oliver M Todd, Jennifer K Burton, Richard M Dodds, Joe Hollinghurst, Ronan A Lyons, Terence J Quinn, Anna Schneider, Katherine E Walesby, Chris Wilkinson, Simon Conroy and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Artificial intelligence for dementia-Applied models and digital health.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Measurement of healthy ageing.Age and ageing · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Oliver M ToddAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK.
Jennifer K BurtonAcademic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G4 OSF, UK.
Richard M DoddsAGE Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Joe HollinghurstHealth Data Research UK (HDR-UK), Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ronan A LyonsHealth Data Research UK (HDR-UK), Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Terence J QuinnAcademic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G4 OSF, UK.
Anna SchneiderSchool of Health & Social Care, Scottish Centre for Administrative Data Research, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Katherine E WalesbyAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
Chris WilkinsonLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Simon ConroyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Chris P GaleLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Marlous HallLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Kate WaltersCentre for Ageing Population Studies, Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College, London, UK.
Andrew P CleggAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK.

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust RTF107/0117Wellcome Trust 206,470/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 206470/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past three decades have seen a steady increase in the availability of routinely collected health and social care data and the processing power to analyse it. These developments represent a major opportunity for ageing research, especially with the integration of different datasets across traditional boundaries of health and social care, for prognostic research and novel evaluations of interventions with representative populations of older people. However, there are considerable challenges in using routine data at the level of coding, data analysis and in the application of findings to everyday care. New Horizons in applying routine data to investigate novel questions in ageing research require a collaborative approach between clinicians, data scientists, biostatisticians, epidemiologists and trial methodologists. This requires building capacity for the next generation of research leaders in this important area. There is a need to develop consensus code lists and standardised, validated algorithms for common conditions and outcomes that are relevant for older people to maximise the potential of routine data research in this group. Lastly, we must help drive the application of routine data to improve the care of older people, through the development of novel methods for evaluation of interventions using routine data infrastructure. We believe that harnessing routine data can help address knowledge gaps for older people living with multiple conditions and frailty, and design interventions and pathways of care to address the complex health issues we face in caring for older people.

Indexed as

AgingFrailtyAgedHumansSocial Supportageingbig datadata linkageelectronic health recordshealth informaticsolder people

Identifiers

PMID32043136
PMCPMC7444666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.