Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32043076›Full record

ReviewCell stress2020

Fine intercellular connections in development: TNTs, cytonemes, or intercellular bridges?

Olga Korenkova, Anna Pepe, Chiara Zurzolo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell stress, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The molecular architecture of tunneling nanotubes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Making a portal for podocyte-parietal cell communication in glomerular injury.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Beyond synapses: cytoplasmic connections in brain function and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga KorenkovaUnit of Membrane Traffic and Pathogenesis, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Anna PepeUnit of Membrane Traffic and Pathogenesis, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Chiara ZurzoloUnit of Membrane Traffic and Pathogenesis, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercellular communication is a fundamental property of multicellular organisms, necessary for their adequate responses to changing environment. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) represent a novel means of intercellular communication being a long cell-to-cell conduit. TNTs are actively formed under a broad range of stresses and are also proposed to exist under physiological conditions. Development is a physiological condition of particular interest, as it requires fine coordination. Here we discuss whether protrusions shown to exist during embryonic development of different species could be TNTs or if they represent other types of cell structure, like cytonemes or intercellular bridges, that are suggested to play an important role in development.

Indexed as

cytonemesintercellular bridgesintercellular communicationTNTstunneling nanotubes

Identifiers

PMID32043076
PMCPMC6997949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.