ArticleJB & JS open access
Establishing "Normal" Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores: A True Reference Score According to Adults Free of Joint Pain and Disability.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Floor and ceiling effects of the international hip outcome tool-12 in patients undergoing hip preservation surgery: A national registry study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Improved Midterm Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in the Setting of a Previous Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Care-Analyzing Routinely Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes. A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Older Adults Following a Major Burn Injury: A Burn Model System Investigation.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025Article
- Patient Reported Outcomes for Maisonneuve Fractures using PROMIS Physical Function Scores.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2025Article
- Defining Clinically Significant Outcome Thresholds for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) at 2 Years After Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- The association of diabetes mellitus and routinely collected patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer. A real-world cohort study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- How Is Variability in Femoral and Acetabular Version Associated With Presentation Among Young Adults With Hip Pain?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Operative treatment of Mason Type III radial head fractures - A comparative analysis using PROMIS.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- The influence of body mass index on patient-reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 3,903 Cases.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Acceptable clinical outcomes despite high reoperation rate at minimum 12-month follow-up after concomitant arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and medial meniscal allograft transplantation.Knee surgery & related research · 2023Article
- Patient-Reported Mental Health Outcomes After Single-Digit Non-thumb Traumatic Amputation in Adults.Eplasty · 2023Article
- Significant Factors of High Performance Outcomes for Tibial Plafond Fractures.Foot & ankle international · 2022Article
- Establishing Age-calibrated Normative PROMIS Scores for Hand and Upper Extremity Clinic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- "Living Well with Chronic Pain": Integrative Pain Management via Shared Medical Appointments.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2021Article
- The PROMIS CAT Demonstrates Responsiveness in Patients After ACL Reconstruction Across Numerous Health Domains.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Investigating the PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference Domains in Elite Athletes.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous recent studies have demonstrated the validity and efficiency of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) forms in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical procedures. It is assumed that a score of 50 in each domain represents the health state of a "reference" population, but this threshold has not been definitively proven. In order to truly assess whether a given orthopaedic intervention is successful, the comparative scores of healthy individuals must be known for any given health domain measured. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine baseline scores for the PROMIS general physical function (PROMIS-PF), pain interference (PROMIS-PI), and upper-extremity physical function (PROMIS-UE) domains in physically healthy, asymptomatic adult individuals. We hypothesized that, in individuals <40 years old, the mean PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-UE scores would be >50 and PROMIS-PI scores would be <50. We further hypothesized that these scores would be impacted by participant age.
methodsThree PROMIS computer adaptive test (CAT) domains were administered (either in person or through email) to healthy adult volunteers. These domains included PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-UE, and PROMIS-PI. Individuals who reported joint pain or dysfunction were excluded.
resultsIn total, 294 healthy volunteers with a mean age of 33.2 years (range, 18 to 83 years) completed all 3 PROMIS CAT forms. The mean (and standard deviation) PROMIS-UE, PROMIS-PF, and PROMIS-PI scores were 55.9 ± 6.6, 59.7 ± 8.0, and 43.6 ± 7.6, respectively, for individuals <40 years old and 51.2 ± 8.2, 52.9 ± 7.6, and 49.0 ± 8.0, respectively, for individuals ≥40 years old. Age correlated significantly with PROMIS-UE and PROMIS-PF in the older cohort.
conclusionsFor individuals <40 years old, baseline PROMIS-PF scores were significantly higher than 50 and PROMIS-PI scores were significantly lower. This difference was less pronounced in individuals ≥40 years old. When treating young patients, clinicians should be cognizant of these healthy baseline scores. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this study, reference range for asymptomatic musculoskeletal volunteers was determined across PROMIS CAT forms. These reference scores are important in treating and counseling patients with musculoskeletal conditions in order to determine relative impairment or functional capabilities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.