ArticleCurrent opinion in endocrine and metabolic research2019
Testosterone Replacement in Men with Age-Related Low Testosterone: What Did We Learn From The Testosterone Trials?
Article in Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of testosterone, the androgen receptor, and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in depression in ageing Men.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Review
- Salivary Testosterone and Sexual Function and Behavior in Men and Women: Findings from the Third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).Journal of sex research · 2022Article
- Prostate-Specific Antigen and Testosterone Levels as Biochemical Indicators of Cognitive Function in Prostate Cancer Survivors and the Role of Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Improving clinical outcomes through attention to sex and hormones in research.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021Review
- Review
- Physical Function and Frailty in HIV.Topics in antiviral medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The T Trials were a coordinated set of seven double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to assess efficacy and safety of testosterone versus placebo gel treatment for one year in 788 older men 65 years or older with hypogonadism who had self-reported and objective impairment of sexual and physical function and/or vitality and an average of two morning serum testosterone concentrations < 275 ng/dL. Testosterone dose was adjusted to the mid-normal range for young men. Compared to placebo, testosterone treatment moderately improved sexual function, hemoglobin concentration and corrected anemia, and slightly improved walking distance, vitality, mood and depressive symptoms and bone density and strength, but did not improve cognitive function. Testosterone treatment slightly increased non-calcified and total plaque volume; while concerning, the clinical significance of this finding is not clear. Testosterone treatment also increased PSA levels and referral for urological evaluation, and caused erythrocytosis in some men. The T Trials provided definitive evidence for short-term clinically meaningful, albeit modest benefits and risks of testosterone treatment in older men with unequivocal age-related hypogonadism. Larger and longer-term placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to assess the long-term benefits and risks of testosterone treatment on clinical outcomes such as frailty, depression, fractures, prostate cancer and cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.