ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2019
Gene-gene interaction: the curse of dimensionality.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individualized co-expression-like index (iCKI) enables gene-gene interactions as individual biomarkers for complex disease.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Genetic Interactions of Phase II Xenobiotic-Metabolizing EnzymesJournal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Article
- Variance quantitative trait loci reveal gene-gene interactions which alter blood traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Biomedical literature mining: graph kernel-based learning for gene-gene interaction extraction.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Integrated multi-omics with machine learning to uncover the intricacies of kidney disease.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- 17 variants interaction of Wnt/β-catenin pathway associated with development of osteonecrosis of femoral head in Chinese Han population.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- LUNGBANK: a novel biorepository strategy tailored for comprehensive multiomics analysis and P-medicine applications in lung cancer.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2024Article
- Putative protective genomic variation in the Lithuanian population.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Searching for gene-gene interactions through variance quantitative trait loci of 29 continuous Taiwan Biobank phenotypes.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Staying Ahead of the Game: How SARS-CoV-2 has Accelerated the Application of Machine Learning in Pandemic Management.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023Review
- HetIG-PreDiG: A Heterogeneous Integrated Graph Model for Predicting Human Disease Genes based on gene expression.PloS one · 2023Article
- Penetrating Exploration of Prognostic Correlations of the FKBP Gene Family with Lung Adenocarcinoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Epi-MEIF: detecting higher order epistatic interactions for complex traits using mixed effect conditional inference forests.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Biomarker interaction selection and disease detection based on multivariate gain ratio.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Functional coding haplotypes and machine-learning feature elimination identifies predictors of Methotrexate Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients.EBioMedicine · 2022Article
- Multifactor dimensionality reduction reveals the effect of interaction between ERAP1 and IFIH1 polymorphisms in psoriasis susceptibility genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Editorial: Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Data Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- What Can Machine Learning Approaches in Genomics Tell Us about the Molecular Basis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis?Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identified genetic variants from genome wide association studies frequently show only modest effects on the disease risk, leading to the "missing heritability" problem. An avenue, to account for a part of this "missingness" is to evaluate gene-gene interactions (epistasis) thereby elucidating their effect on complex diseases. This can potentially help with identifying gene functions, pathways, and drug targets. However, the exhaustive evaluation of all possible genetic interactions among millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) raises several issues, otherwise known as the "curse of dimensionality". The dimensionality involved in the epistatic analysis of such exponentially growing SNPs diminishes the usefulness of traditional, parametric statistical methods. With the immense popularity of multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR), a non-parametric method, proposed in 2001, that classifies multi-dimensional genotypes into one- dimensional binary approaches, led to the emergence of a fast-growing collection of methods that were based on the MDR approach. Moreover, machine-learning (ML) methods such as random forests and neural networks (NNs), deep-learning (DL) approaches, and hybrid approaches have also been applied profusely, in the recent years, to tackle this dimensionality issue associated with whole genome gene-gene interaction studies. However, exhaustive searching in MDR based approaches or variable selection in ML methods, still pose the risk of missing out on relevant SNPs. Furthermore, interpretability issues are a major hindrance for DL methods. To minimize this loss of information, Python based tools such as PySpark can potentially take advantage of distributed computing resources in the cloud, to bring back smaller subsets of data for further local analysis. Parallel computing can be a powerful resource that stands to fight this "curse". PySpark supports all standard Python libraries and C extensions thus making it convenient to write codes to deliver dramatic improvements in processing speed for extraordinarily large sets of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.