ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019
The multidisciplinary team plays an important role in the prediction of small solitary pulmonary nodules: a propensity-score-matching study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of the clinical value of multidisciplinary team-based multimodal interventions in pulmonary nodule management.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Lung Cancer Screening: Implementation Challenges and Health Equity Considerations For the Western Pacific Region.JCO global oncology · 2023Review
- Incidence and Prognosis Nomogram of Small Solitary Lung Cancer (≤2 cm) With Extra-Thoracic Metastasis at Initial Diagnosis:A Population-Based Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to guidelines, it is recommended that pulmonary nodules be discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT); however, the evidence for the effectiveness of MDT is sparse. To demonstrate the importance of the involvement of an MDT for the prediction of small solitary pulmonary nodules, we conducted this retrospective study.
methodsThe patient database of those who attended our MDT and the electronic medical record system of our hospital was used; we collected all the data from patients found with small solitary pulmonary nodules (≤2 cm), which were suspected as malignant and who received a resection of the nodules. We summarized their characteristics and analyzed them, and then compared the post-operation pathological diagnosis of the patients who attended an MDT to those who did not participate in an MDT during the same period (2017-2019.2). We also collected the follow-up data. Propensity-score-matching was utilized during the process of analysis to get a more reliable conclusion.
resultsMost of the qualified patients were female. Most of the small solitary pulmonary nodules (≤2 cm) were adenocarcinoma and located on the right upper lobe. There were no differences in the SUV value between malignant nodules and benign nodules. After propensity-score matching, the total positive prediction value of small solitary pulmonary nodules (≤2 cm) without an MDT was 69.4%, while that with MDT was 77.6%; the difference was not significant with a P value of 0.30. The negative predictive value of MDT was 76.2%.
conclusionsIn developing countries, small solitary pulmonary nodules tend to be more correctly diagnosed with MDT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.