Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042438›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

A physical activity intervention to improve the quality of life of patients with a stoma: a feasibility study.

Gill Hubbard, Claire Taylor, Angus J M Watson, Julie Munro, William Goodman, Rebecca J Beeken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient reported outcome measures assessing quality of life in patients with an intestinal stoma: A systematic review.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Quality of Life and Its Determinants in Older Adults with Intestinal Stomas: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gill Hubbard1Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Health Science, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2165-5770
Claire Taylor2St Mark's Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ UK.
Angus J M Watson3Department of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, NHS Highland, Old Perth Rd, Inverness, IV2 3UJ UK.
Julie Munro1Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Health Science, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH UK.
William Goodman4Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK.
Rebecca J Beeken4Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14133Cancer Research UK 27498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe hypothesise that a physical activity (PA) intervention will improve the quality of life (QoL) of people with a stoma. A feasibility study of the intervention and trial parameters is necessary to inform a future main trial.

methodsParticipants received a weekly PA consultation by telephone, video conferencing, or face-to-face for 12 weeks with a PA instructor who prescribed physical activities and supported participants by addressing stoma-related concerns and using behaviour change techniques. A feasibility study of the intervention and trial parameters was conducted in three UK sites using mixed methods.

resultsThe number of eligible patients consenting to the study was 30 out of 174 (17%). Most participants were female (73%); 73% had an ileostomy and 27% a colostomy; mean time since diagnosis was 6 months. A total of 18 (64%) participants completed pre- (baseline) and post-intervention (follow-up) measures. Results show an improvement on all scales measuring QoL and disease-specific fatigue. The median PA consultation rate per participant was eight sessions. Participants reported completing 75% or more of the prescribed PA each week. Eight stoma-related themes were identified from qualitative interviews: fear of hernia, bending down, fatigue, pain, prolapse, surgical wounds, stoma appliance, and stigma. The intervention appeared to address these issues.

conclusionThis feasibility study demonstrated that a novel manualised PA intervention for people with a stoma is safe, feasible, and acceptable, and shows promise for improving outcomes. However, difficulties with recruitment will need to be carefully considered to ensure the success of future studies in this area.

trial registrationISCTN, ISRCTN58613962; Registered 14/9/2017.

Identifiers

PMID32042438
PMCPMC7001297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.