Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042365›Full record

ArticleGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society2020

Flow cytometric micronucleus assay and TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker analysis of ten genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells.

Julie K Buick, Andrew Williams, Rémi Gagné, Carol D Swartz, Leslie Recio, Stephen S Ferguson, Carole L Yauk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancing genotoxicity assessment with transcriptomic biomarkers: from 2D to 3D HepaRG spheroid models.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. TGx-DDI (toxicogenomic DNA damage-inducing) biomarker validation: multi-site ring trial supporting regulatory use.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Transferability and Reproducibility of the HepaRG CometChip Assay.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. HepaRGNAM journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Application of HepaRG cells for genotoxicity assessment: a review.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2024
    Review
  16. State of the Art of Genomic Technology in Toxicology: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Development of a micronucleus test using the EpiAirway™ organotypic human airway model.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie K Buick1Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 Canada.
Andrew Williams1Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 Canada.
Rémi Gagné1Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 Canada.
Carol D Swartz2Integrated Laboratory Systems Inc. (ILS), Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27709 USA.
Leslie Recio2Integrated Laboratory Systems Inc. (ILS), Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27709 USA.
Stephen S Ferguson3National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27709 USA.
Carole L Yauk1Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 Canada.
Health Canada · CAIntegrated Laboratory Systems, Inc. · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern testing paradigms seek to apply human-relevant cell culture models and integrate data from multiple test systems to accurately inform potential hazards and modes of action for chemical toxicology. In genetic toxicology, the use of metabolically competent human hepatocyte cell culture models provides clear advantages over other more commonly used cell lines that require the use of external metabolic activation systems, such as rat liver S9. HepaRG™ cells are metabolically competent cells that express Phase I and II metabolic enzymes and differentiate into mature hepatocyte-like cells, making them ideal for toxicity testing. We assessed the performance of the flow cytometry in vitro micronucleus (MN) test and the TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker to detect DNA damage-inducing (DDI) chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells after a 3-day repeat exposure. The biomarker, developed for use in human TK6 cells, is a panel of 64 genes that accurately classifies chemicals as DDI or non-DDI. Herein, the TGx-DDI biomarker was analyzed by Ion AmpliSeq whole transcriptome sequencing to assess its classification accuracy using this more modern gene expression technology as a secondary objective.

methodsHepaRG™ cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of 10 test chemicals (six genotoxic chemicals, including one aneugen, and four non-genotoxic chemicals). Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were measured using the In Vitro MicroFlow® kit, which was run in parallel with the TGx-DDI biomarker.

resultsA concentration-related decrease in relative survival and a concomitant increase in MN frequency were observed for genotoxic chemicals in HepaRG™ cells. All five DDI and five non-DDI agents were correctly classified (as genotoxic/non-genotoxic and DDI/non-DDI) by pairing the test methods. The aneugenic agent (colchicine) yielded the expected positive result in the MN test and negative (non-DDI) result by TGx-DDI.

conclusionsThis next generation genotoxicity testing strategy is aligned with the paradigm shift occurring in the field of genetic toxicology. It provides mechanistic insight in a human-relevant cell-model, paired with measurement of a conventional endpoint, to inform the potential for adverse health effects. This work provides support for combining these assays in an integrated test strategy for accurate, higher throughput genetic toxicology testing in this metabolically competent human progenitor cell line.

Indexed as

Genetic toxicologyMicronucleusRNA-SeqTGx-28.65 genomic biomarkerToxicogenomics

Identifiers

PMID32042365
PMCPMC7001283
OpenAlexW3012888978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.