ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Does the
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- H-Type Indices With Applications in Chemometrics: h-Accuracy Index for Evaluating and Comparing Errors in Analytical Chemistry.Journal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2024Article
- Orthopedic Surgery Fellowship Directors: Trends in Demographics, Education, Employment, and Institutional Familiarity.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health-supported relative citation ratio among American orthopedic spine surgery faculty: A new bibliometric measure of scientific influence.North American Spine Society journal · 2022Article
- A scientometric study of Iran and the world countries' contribution to internal medicine (1996-2019).Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Sports Medicine Fellowships in the United States Based on Academic Productivity.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDetermine the impact of self-citation on external funding for orthopedic fellowship directors.
methodsThe San Francisco Match's website identified directors encompassing 8 subspecialties. The Scopus database identified the number of publications, citations, and
resultsMean publications, citations, self-citation rate, and
conclusionsSelf-citation has minimal impact among fellowship directors and should not be adjusted for when considering external funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.