Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042169›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2020

Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing.

Eli L Moss, Dylan G Maghini, Ami S Bhatt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed
30.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 415 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Col-BWT: Pangenomic Seed Chaining with Maximal Matches Improves Read Classification.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eli L Moss *Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Dylan G Maghini *Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ami S BhattDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. asbhatt@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-2975
Stanford University · USStanford Blood Center · US

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Melinda L. Telli · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer Kaci Fairchild · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Working Memory in Parkinson Disease: A Cognitive & Systems Neuroscience ApproachP50AG047366 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HENDERSON, VICTOR · 2015 to 2019
$7.9M
Culture-free pathogen tracking in hospitalized patientsR01AI143757 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATT, AMI SIDDHARTH · 2020 to 2023
$3.0M
Emerging novel mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in the prevalent foodborne pathogen, SalmonellaR01AI148623 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATT, AMI SIDDHARTH · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143757NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148623NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS P50 AG047366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial genomes can be assembled from short-read sequencing data, but the assembly contiguity of these metagenome-assembled genomes is constrained by repeat elements. Correct assignment of genomic positions of repeats is crucial for understanding the effect of genome structure on genome function. We applied nanopore sequencing and our workflow, named Lathe, which incorporates long-read assembly and short-read error correction, to assemble closed bacterial genomes from complex microbiomes. We validated our approach with a synthetic mixture of 12 bacterial species. Seven genomes were completely assembled into single contigs and three genomes were assembled into four or fewer contigs. Next, we used our methods to analyze metagenomics data from 13 human stool samples. We assembled 20 circular genomes, including genomes of Prevotella copri and a candidate Cibiobacter sp. Despite the decreased nucleotide accuracy compared with alternative sequencing and assembly approaches, our methods improved assembly contiguity, allowing for investigation of the role of repeat elements in microbial function and adaptation.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsDNA, BacterialDogsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome, BacterialHumansMetagenomicsMiceNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID32042169
PMCPMC7283042
OpenAlexW3005528502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.