Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042154›Full record

ReviewNature plants2020

Synchronization of developmental, molecular and metabolic aspects of source-sink interactions.

Alisdair R Fernie, Christian W B Bachem, Yrjö Helariutta, H Ekkehard Neuhaus, Salomé Prat, Yong-Ling Ruan, Mark Stitt, Lee J Sweetlove, Mechthild Tegeder, Vanessa Wahl and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature plants, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptomic analysis of three fig (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alisdair R FernieMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany. fernie@mpimp-golm.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-335X
Christian W B BachemPlant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-6833
Yrjö HelariuttaThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7287-8459
H Ekkehard NeuhausUniversity of Kaiserslautern Pflanzenphysiologie, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Salomé PratDepartment of Plant Molecular Genetics, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Yong-Ling RuanSchool of Environmental & Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-4474
Mark StittMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Lee J SweetloveDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-4133
Mechthild TegederSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Vanessa WahlMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-8801
Sophia SonnewaldDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. sophia.sonnewald@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9185-6255
Uwe SonnewaldDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. uwe.sonnewald@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-5339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants have evolved a multitude of strategies to adjust their growth according to external and internal signals. Interconnected metabolic and phytohormonal signalling networks allow adaption to changing environmental and developmental conditions and ensure the survival of species in fluctuating environments. In agricultural ecosystems, many of these adaptive responses are not required or may even limit crop yield, as they prevent plants from realizing their fullest potential. By lifting source and sink activities to their maximum, massive yield increases can be foreseen, potentially closing the future yield gap resulting from an increasing world population and the transition to a carbon-neutral economy. To do so, a better understanding of the interplay between metabolic and developmental processes is required. In the past, these processes have been tackled independently from each other, but coordinated efforts are required to understand the fine mechanics of source-sink relations and thus optimize crop yield. Here, we describe approaches to design high-yielding crop plants utilizing strategies derived from current metabolic concepts and our understanding of the molecular processes determining sink development.

Indexed as

Carbon SequestrationCarbonCrop ProductionCrops, AgriculturalCarbon

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.