Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042119›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2020

Antagonistic pleiotropy conceals molecular adaptations in changing environments.

Piaopiao Chen, Jianzhi Zhang

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The evolutionary genomics of adaptation to stress in wild rhizobium bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Reduced social function in experimentally evolvedProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Patterns and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. What Has Genomics Taught An Evolutionary Biologist?Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piaopiao ChenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jianzhi ZhangDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jianzhi@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6141-1290
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Pleiotropy: patterns, mechanisms, and evolutionary consequencesR01GM103232 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, JIANZHI · 2013 to 2020
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of positive selection in molecular evolution is debated. Evolution experiments under invariant laboratory conditions typically show a higher rate of nonsynonymous nucleotide changes than the rate of synonymous changes, demonstrating prevalent molecular adaptations. Natural evolution inferred from genomic comparisons, however, almost always exhibits the opposite pattern even among closely related conspecifics, which is indicative of a paucity of positive selection. Here we hypothesize that this apparent contradiction is at least in part attributable to ubiquitous and frequent environmental changes in nature, causing nonsynonymous mutations that are beneficial at one time to become deleterious soon after because of antagonistic pleiotropy and hindering their fixations relative to synonymous mutations despite continued population adaptations. To test this hypothesis, we performed yeast evolution experiments in changing and corresponding constant environments, followed by genome sequencing of the evolving populations. We observed a lower nonsynonymous to synonymous rate ratio in antagonistic changing environments than in the corresponding constant environments, and the population dynamics of mutations supports our hypothesis. These findings and the accompanying population genetic simulations suggest that molecular adaptation is consistently underestimated in nature due to the antagonistic fitness effects of mutations in changing environments.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalSelection, GeneticAcclimatizationEvolution, MolecularMutation

Identifiers

PMID32042119
PMCPMC7058517
OpenAlexW3005473190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.