Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042109›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2020

Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats.

Bert N Bakker, Gijs Schumacher, Claire Gothreau, Kevin Arceneaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Politics embodied: How politics shapes and is shaped by the bodily experience of emotions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Scenario-Based Messages on Social Media Motivate COVID-19 Information Seeking.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Is negativity bias intuitive for liberals and conservatives?Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bert N BakkerAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. b.n.bakker@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-5045
Gijs SchumacherDepartment of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-4514
Claire GothreauCenter for American Women and Politics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Kevin ArceneauxDepartment of Political Science, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2884-5238

Funding

European Research Council 759079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About a decade ago, a study documented that conservatives have stronger physiological responses to threatening stimuli than liberals. This work launched an approach aimed at uncovering the biological roots of ideology. Despite wide-ranging scientific and popular impact, independent laboratories have not replicated the study. We conducted a pre-registered direct replication (n = 202) and conceptual replications in the United States (n = 352) and the Netherlands (n = 81). Our analyses do not support the conclusions of the original study, nor do we find evidence for broader claims regarding the effect of disgust and the existence of a physiological trait. Rather than studying unconscious responses as the real predispositions, alignment between conscious and unconscious responses promises deeper insights into the emotional roots of ideology.

Indexed as

PoliticsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisgustFearFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32042109
PMCPMC7306406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.