Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042108›Full record

Trial reportNature human behaviour2020

Interplay of chronotype and school timing predicts school performance.

Andrea P Goldin, Mariano Sigman, Gisela Braier, Diego A Golombek, María J Leone

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Night Owls and Early Birds: The Role of Adolescents' Chronotype on Educational Identity Trajectories.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The economic costs and consequences of (insufficient) sleep: a case study from Latin America.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea P GoldinUniversidad Torcuato Di Tella, CONICET, Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-0890
Mariano SigmanUniversidad Torcuato Di Tella, CONICET, Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-0033
Gisela BraierUniversidad Torcuato Di Tella, CONICET, Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Diego A GolombekUniversidad Nacional de Quilmes, CONICET, Laboratorio de Cronobiología, Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6291-5586
María J LeoneUniversidad Torcuato Di Tella, CONICET, Laboratorio de Neurociencia, Buenos Aires, Argentina. mleone@utdt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1687-8550
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational University of Quilmes · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most adolescents exhibit very late chronotypes and attend school early in the morning, a misalignment that can affect their health and psychological well-being. Here we examine how the interaction between the chronotype and school timing of an individual influences academic performance, studying a unique sample of 753 Argentinian students who were randomly assigned to start school in the morning (07:45), afternoon (12:40) or evening (17:20). Although chronotypes tend to align partially with class time, this effect is insufficient to fully account for the differences with school start time. We show that (1) for morning-attending students, early chronotypes perform better than late chronotypes in all school subjects, an effect that is largest for maths; (2) this effect vanishes for students who attend school in the afternoon; and (3) late chronotypes benefit from evening classes. Together, these results demonstrate that academic performance is improved when school times are better aligned with the biological rhythms of adolescents.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceCircadian RhythmEducational StatusAdolescentAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsStudentsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32042108
OpenAlexW3004750571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.