Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32042100›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2020

Role of glucosyltransferase R in biofilm interactions between Streptococcus oralis and Candida albicans.

João Gabriel Silva Souza, Martinna Bertolini, Angela Thompson, Jillian M Mansfield, André Alex Grassmann, Kendra Maas, Melissa J Caimano, Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barao, M Margaret Vickerman, Anna Dongari-Bagtzoglou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exopolysaccharides metabolism and cariogenesis ofJournal of oral microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Roles ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Interactions betweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Recent Advances and Opportunities in the Study ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Insights From theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

João Gabriel Silva SouzaDepartment of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Martinna BertoliniDepartment of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Angela ThompsonDepartment of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Jillian M MansfieldDepartment of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
André Alex GrassmannDepartments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Kendra MaasMicrobial Analysis, Resources, and Services Core, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Melissa J CaimanoDepartments of Medicine, Pediatrics and Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Valentim Adelino Ricardo BaraoDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
M Margaret VickermanDepartment of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. mmv4@buffalo.edu.
Anna Dongari-BagtzoglouDepartment of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA. adongari@uchc.edu.
University of Connecticut · USUConn Health · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

RpoS Regulation of Borrelia burgdorferi Genes in vivoR01AI029735 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI CAIMANO, MELISSA J, RADOLF, JUSTIN D · 1990 to 2022
$10.7M
Oral Epithelial Cells, Candida and PMN ActivationR01DE013986 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI Anna I Dongari-Bagtzoglou · 2000 to 2026
$9.2M
Essential role of Hk1/Rrp1 TCS for survival of Borrelia burgdorferi in ticksR21AI126146 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CAIMANO, MELISSA J · 2016 to 2017
$439k
Identification of genes required by Leptospira interrogans for mammalian host adaptation and/or persistence in the rat modelR21AI128379 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CAIMANO, MELISSA J · 2017 to 2018
$439k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI128379NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcal glucosyltransferases (Gtf) synthesize α-glucan exopolymers which contribute to biofilm matrix. Streptococcus oralis interacts with the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans to form hypervirulent biofilms. S. oralis 34 has a single gtf gene (gtfR). However, the role of gtfR in single and mixed species biofilms with C. albicans has never been examined. A gtfR deletion mutant, purified GtfR, and recombinant GtfR glucan-binding domain were tested in single and mixed biofilms on different substrata in vitro. A mouse oral infection model was also used. We found that in single species biofilms growing with sucrose on abiotic surfaces S. oralis gtfR increased biofilm matrix, but not bacterial biomass. In biofilms with C. albicans, S. oralis encoding gtfR showed increased bacterial biomass on all surfaces. C. albicans had a positive effect on α-glucan synthesis, and α-glucans increased C. albicans accretion on abiotic surfaces. In single and mixed infection of mice receiving sucrose S. oralis gtfR enhanced mucosal burdens. However, sucrose had a negative impact on C. albicans burdens and reduced S. oralis burdens in co-infected mice. Our data provide new insights on the GtfR-mediated interactions between the two organisms and the influence of biofilm substratum and the mucosal environment on these interactions.

Indexed as

BiofilmsAnimalsCandida albicansGlucansGlucosyltransferasesGlycogen Debranching Enzyme SystemMiceStreptococcusStreptococcus mutansStreptococcus oralis4 alpha-glucanotransferaseGlucansGlucosyltransferasesGlycogen Debranching Enzyme System

Identifiers

PMID32042100
PMCPMC7174356
OpenAlexW3004967314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.