ArticleScientific reports2020
3D Patterning of cells in Magnetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering anisotropic tissues: from structured scaffolds to magnetic actuation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Advanced Mathematical Platform for the Control and Manipulation of Magnetized Living Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Toward 4D printed functional soft tissues.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Strategies to control cellular spatial organization in microphysiological systems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- Magnetized Cell-Scaffold Constructs for Bone Tissue Engineering: Advances in Fabrication and Magnetic Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Precision: Unveiling the Potential of 3D Printing in Drug Delivery, Tissue Engineering, and Regenerative Medicine.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2025Article
- Stimuli-responsive hybrid materials for 4DMaterials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Roadmap on magnetic nanoparticles in nanomedicine.Nanotechnology · 2024Review
- Progress in Organ Bioprinting for Regenerative Medicine.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Review
- Physical-property-based patterning: simply engineering complex tissues.Trends in biotechnology · 2024Review
- Biomaterials functionalized with magnetic nanoparticles for tissue engineering: Between advantages and challenges.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2024Article
- Harnessing extracellular vesicles-mediated signaling for enhanced bone regeneration: novel insights into scaffold design.Biomedical materials (Bristol, England) · 2024Article
- A comprehensive approach to characterize navigation instruments for magnetic guidance in biological systems.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Application of magnetism in tissue regeneration: recent progress and future prospects.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Biomaterials Adapted to Vat Photopolymerization in 3D Printing: Characteristics and Medical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) [P(3HB-co-3HV)] Biodegradable Scaffolds: Properties, In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Versatile magnetic configuration for the control and manipulation of superparamagnetic nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Review of Biomimetic and Biodegradable Magnetic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A three dimensional magnetic patterning of two cell types was realised in vitro inside an additive manufactured magnetic scaffold, as a conceptual precursor for the vascularised tissue. The realisation of separate arrangements of vascular and osteoprogenitor cells, labelled with biocompatible magnetic nanoparticles, was established on the opposite sides of the scaffold fibres under the effect of non-homogeneous magnetic gradients and loading magnetic configuration. The magnetisation of the scaffold amplified the guiding effects by an additional trapping of cells due to short range magnetic forces. The mathematical modelling confirmed the strong enhancement of the magnetic gradients and their particular geometrical distribution near the fibres, defining the preferential cell positioning on the micro-scale. The manipulation of cells inside suitably designed magnetic scaffolds represents a unique solution for the assembling of cellular constructs organised in biologically adequate arrangements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.