ArticleThe American journal of case reports2020
Percutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in a Patient with Chronic Bilateral Painful Glossopharyngeal Neuropathy.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to its rareness, we present a case of chronic, bilateral, painful glossopharyngeal neuropathy, which developed after nasal septum and inferior concha surgery, and was non-surgically treated with percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency at the glossopharyngeal nerve, using an extra-oral approach. CASE REPORT A 41-year-old Caucasian female patient (60 kg, 1.57 m, body mass index 24.8 kg/m²) was referred to the Pain Center by her general practitioner because of ongoing pressing pain in her throat 4 months after nasal septum and inferior concha surgery. Based upon medical history, physical examination and the results of additional questionnaires, a probable diagnosis of atypical neck pain was made, based on ongoing glossopharyngeal stimulation, involvement of the pterygopalatine ganglion or/and superior cervical ganglion, with secondary involvement of the muscles of the neck. We changed the analgesic regimen and performed a pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the glossopharyngeal nerve on both sides. The patient had made progress and reported that she actually felt better but she asked for repeat treatment because of residual complaints. We performed the procedure for a second time on both sides. The results of the questionnaires before (T0) treatment, 3 months after the first (T1) and 3 months after the second (T2) treatment are provided. After the second procedure, the patient reported that her swallowing complaints had further diminished, as well as the pain behind her ears. She stopped using pregabalin. Residual complaints were manageable. CONCLUSIONS In patients with painful glossopharyngeal neuropathy, a non-surgically treatment with percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency at the glossopharyngeal nerve, using an extra-oral approach, seems to be an effective and safe method to use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.