Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041870›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Molecular underpinnings of cytoskeletal cross-talk.

Angela Oberhofer, Emanuel Reithmann, Peter Spieler, Willi L Stepp, Dennis Zimmermann, Bettina Schmid, Erwin Frey, Zeynep Ökten

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigating byssus self-assembly ofMarine life science & technology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New twists in actin-microtubule interactions.Molecular biology of the cell · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela OberhoferPhysik Department E22, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
Emanuel ReithmannArnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, D-80333 München, Germany.
Peter SpielerPhysik Department E22, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
Willi L SteppPhysik Department E22, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
Dennis ZimmermannKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Bettina SchmidGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, D-81377 München, Germany.
Erwin FreyArnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, D-80333 München, Germany; frey@lmu.de zoekten@ph.tum.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8792-3358
Zeynep ÖktenPhysik Department E22, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany; frey@lmu.de zoekten@ph.tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-3488
Technical University of Munich · DECenter for NanoScience · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-talk between the microtubule and actin networks has come under intense scrutiny following the realization that it is crucial for numerous essential processes, ranging from cytokinesis to cell migration. It is becoming increasingly clear that proteins long-considered highly specific for one or the other cytoskeletal system do, in fact, make use of both filament types. How this functional duality of "shared proteins" has evolved and how their coadaptation enables cross-talk at the molecular level remain largely unknown. We previously discovered that the mammalian adaptor protein melanophilin of the actin-associated myosin motor is one such "shared protein," which also interacts with microtubules in vitro. In a hypothesis-driven in vitro and in silico approach, we turn to early and lower vertebrates and ask two fundamental questions. First, is the capability of interacting with microtubules and actin filaments unique to mammalian melanophilin or did it evolve over time? Second, what is the functional consequence of being able to interact with both filament types at the cellular level? We describe the emergence of a protein domain that confers the capability of interacting with both filament types onto melanophilin. Strikingly, our computational modeling demonstrates that the regulatory power of this domain on the microscopic scale alone is sufficient to recapitulate previously observed behavior of pigment organelles in amphibian melanophores. Collectively, our dissection provides a molecular framework for explaining the underpinnings of functional cross-talk and its potential to orchestrate the cell-wide redistribution of organelles on the cytoskeleton.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsCytoskeletonEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationVertebratesbottom-up reconstitutioncross-talkcytoskeletonintracellular organizationwhole-cell simulation

Identifiers

PMID32041870
PMCPMC7049146
OpenAlexW3004970263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.