Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041865›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

'Function First-Be Active, Stay Independent'-promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions by primary care: a protocol for a realist synthesis with embedded co-production and co-design.

Rebecca-Jane Law, Lynne Williams, Joseph Langley, Christopher Burton, Beth Hall, Julia Hiscock, Val Morrison, Andrew Lemmey, Rebecca Partridge, Candida Lovell-Smith and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebecca-Jane LawNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK r.law@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-5086
Lynne WilliamsSchool of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2575-9710
Joseph LangleyLab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9770-8720
Christopher BurtonSchool of Allied Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1159-1494
Beth HallLibrary and Archives Service, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4980-3720
Julia HiscockNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8963-2981
Val MorrisonSchool of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-8976
Andrew LemmeySchool of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1667-4539
Rebecca PartridgeLab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Candida Lovell-SmithPPI Research Partner, UK.
John GallandersPPI Research Partner, UK.
Nefyn WilliamsDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-409X

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/17/45/22Department of Health KMRF-2013-02-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with long-term conditions typically have reduced physical functioning, are less physically active and therefore become less able to live independently and do the things they enjoy. However, assessment and promotion of physical function and physical activity is not part of routine management in primary care. This project aims to develop evidence-based recommendations about how primary care can best help people to become more physically active in order to maintain and improve their physical function, thus promoting independence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study takes a realist synthesis approach, following RAMESES guidance, with embedded co-production and co-design. Stage 1 will develop initial programme theories about physical activity and physical function for people with long-term conditions, based on a review of the scientific and grey literature, and two multisector stakeholder workshops using LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®. Stage 2 will involve focused literature searching, data extraction and synthesis to provide evidence to support or refute the initial programme theories. Searches for evidence will focus on physical activity interventions involving the assessment of physical function which are relevant to primary care. We will describe 'what works', 'for whom' and 'in what circumstances' and develop conjectured programme theories using context, mechanism and outcome configurations. Stage 3 will test and refine these theories through individual stakeholder interviews. The resulting theory-driven recommendations will feed into Stage 4 which will involve three sequential co-design stakeholder workshops in which practical ideas for service innovation in primary care will be developed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Healthcare and Medical Sciences Academic Ethics Committee (Reference 2018-16308) and NHS Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 approval (References 256 729 and 262726) have been obtained. A knowledge mobilisation event will address issues relevant to wider implementation of the intervention and study findings. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and formal and informal reports. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018103027.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseExerciseHealth PromotionPrimary Health CareState MedicineDelivery of Health CareHumansReview Literature as Topicco-designevidence synthesisphysical activityprimary carerealist

Identifiers

PMID32041865
PMCPMC7045082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.