Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041685›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

The challenges of estimating biological age.

Alexey Moskalev

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Use of Personal Resources May Influence the Rate of Biological Aging Depending on Individual Typology.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexey MoskalevInstitute of Biology of the Komi Science Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-1633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparison of nine different approaches over a period of 20 years reveals the most promising indicators for biological age.

Indexed as

Follow-Up Studiesagingbiological agecorrelationepidemiologyglobal healthhumanlongitudinal trajectorymortality

Identifiers

PMID32041685
PMCPMC7012619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.