Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041664›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2020

Factors associated with utilization of adolescent-friendly services in Bhaktapur district, Nepal.

Krishtee Napit, Khadga Bahadur Shrestha, Sudip Ale Magar, Rashmi Paudel, Barsha Thapa, Bhup Raj Dhakal, Archana Amatya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Krishtee NapitMaharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal. crishtee@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7126-4618
Khadga Bahadur ShresthaInterdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, 4-4-37 Takeda Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8510, Japan.
Sudip Ale MagarPolicy, Planning and Monitoring Division, Ministry of Health and Population, Ramshahpath, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rashmi PaudelPossible Health, Dolakha, Nepal.
Barsha ThapaSave the Children, Pokhara, Nepal.
Bhup Raj DhakalSave the Children, Butwal, Nepal.
Archana AmatyaMaharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NPMinistry of Health and Population · NPPokhara University · NPTakeda (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe status of adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in Nepal is alarming. Adolescent-friendly services (AFS) were introduced to cater the health needs of adolescents. Optimal utilization of the services with wider accessibility is required to prevent adolescents from adopting life-threatening behaviors that result in poor SRH-related outcomes. Despite the upgrading of health facilities to adolescent-friendly sites, studies reveal low utilization of the service. However, these studies failed to explore the factors influencing the low levels of service utilization in these adolescent-friendly facilities. This study quantified the utilization of AFS and identified factors associated with its utilization among adolescents of Bhaktapur district.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 362 systematic randomly selected adolescents from four village development committees of Bhaktapur district was conducted, using a self-administered questionnaire. Relationships between utilization of AFS and associated factors were determined by multivariate logistic regression at a level of significance with a p value of less than 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio. Key informant interviews and focus group discussions with adolescents were used to collect qualitative data which were then described using thematic analysis.

resultAbout a quarter (24.7%) of the respondents had utilized the adolescent-friendly services. Factors positively associated with the utilization of services included adolescents aged 15-19 years, female, heard about AFS, lack of fear of being seen while getting SRH services, lack of shyness about receiving SRH services, and the perceived need for SRH services as soon as illness became apparent. The qualitative findings revealed lack of awareness about the services, socio-cultural barriers, confidentiality, feasible service hours, and the preference for of same-sex service providers as the factors affecting utilization.

conclusionThe utilization of adolescent-friendly services was very low in Bhaktapur district. Most of the adolescents were unaware of the existence of the AFS which emphasizes the need to focus on the increasing awareness of SRH and AFS by the government in coordination with local schools, clubs, etc. Creating an enabling environment in the service delivery sites, and ensuring privacy and confidentiality, as well as ensuring same-sex service providers and feasible service hours to adolescents, could increase the service utilization.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleNepalPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAdolescent-friendly servicesBhaktapurSexual and reproductive healthUtilization

Identifiers

PMID32041664
PMCPMC7011236
OpenAlexW3005917364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.