Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041648›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2020

Barriers and opportunities for breast cancer organizations to focus on environmental health and disease prevention: a mixed-methods approach using website analyses, interviews, and focus groups.

Jennifer Liss Ohayon, Eric Nost, Kami Silk, Michele Rakoff, Julia Green Brody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer Liss OhayonSilent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, Suite 302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA. ohayon@silentspring.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-4187
Eric NostUniversity of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Kami SilkUniversity of Delaware, Newark, USA.
Michele RakoffBreast Cancer Care & Research Fund, Los Angeles, USA.
Julia Green BrodySilent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, Suite 302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA.

Funding

Environmental chemicals and postpubertal breast composition in a Latino cohortU01ES026130 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BRODY, JULIA GREEN, CORVALAN, CAMILA · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
Transdisciplinary Training at the Intersection of Environmental Health Science and Social Science (EH+SS)T32ES023769 · NIEHS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, JULIA GREEN, BROWN, PHILIP M. · 2015 to 2025
$3.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES023769NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES026130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and most cases are not due to high risk inherited genes. In response, breast cancer activists successfully advocated for innovative research on environmental chemical exposures as a possible cause. Since then, new evidence supports hypotheses that common industrial and consumer chemicals are linked to the disease, and expert panels recommend reducing exposures. We evaluated whether these research results and recommendations are translated back into the work of breast cancer organizations and what barriers and opportunities influence their ability to focus on environmental factors.

methodsWe used a Python script to evaluate the frequency of environmental terms on the websites of 81 breast cancer organizations (> 14,000 associated URLs) and conducted two focus groups and 20 interviews with leaders of breast cancer organizations. We also analyzed the frequency of terms on two trusted, national cancer websites.

results40% of organizations include information on environmental chemicals on their websites, but references are infrequent and rarely cite specific chemicals of concern. Most organizations (82%) discuss other risk factors such as exercise, diet, family history, or genetics. From interviews and focus groups, we identified four types of barriers to addressing environmental chemicals: 1) time and resource constraints, 2) limited knowledge of the state of the research and lack of access to experts, 3) difficulties with messaging, including concern that cultural and economic factors make it difficult for individuals to reduce their exposures, and 4) institutional obstacles, such as the downplaying of environmental risks by industry interests. Participants expressed the desire for easy-to-adopt educational programs and increased federal funding for scientist-advocate research partnerships.

conclusionOur research underscores the need for environmental breast cancer experts and trusted cancer organizations to increase research translation activities so that breast cancer organizations can communicate new science on environmental factors in their online and in-person work. Moreover, our research highlights how most groups are focusing on providing resources to diagnosed women, including addressing problems with healthcare access, which displaces their ability to work on breast cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthFocus GroupsInternetInterviews as TopicBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPrimary PreventionActivismBreast cancerCommunity outreachEnvironmental chemicalsEnvironmental healthResearch translationRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32041648
PMCPMC7011560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.