Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Vulnerability in health and social capital: a qualitative analysis by levels of marginalization in Mexico.

Oscar A Martínez-Martínez, Anidelys Rodríguez-Brito

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Chelsea Research Festival Model: Disseminating Research, Bridging Community and Academia, and Centering Youth.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Relationship between Health Inequalities and Breast Cancer Survival in Mexican Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oscar A Martínez-MartínezUniversidad Iberoamericana, México City, Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 880, Álvaro Obregón, Lomas de Santa Fe, 01219, México City, Mexico. oscar.martinez@ibero.mx.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-674X
Anidelys Rodríguez-BritoUniversidad Iberoamericana, México City, Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 880, Álvaro Obregón, Lomas de Santa Fe, 01219, México City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4034-7757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial capital is employed as an asset when there is a lack of an efficient health-care system. However, this relationship is not homogeneous and can differ according to the characteristics of individuals and their context. In this paper, we aim to analyze the role of social capital in the solution of healthcare problems among individuals with different levels of marginalization and unequal access to health services.

methodsThis qualitative study examines the role of social capital in the demand for healthcare among Mexican individuals with different levels of marginalization. The research draws data from semi-structured interviews (N = 247) that were collected in four Mexican states with different social welfare benefits: Mexico City, Tamaulipas, the State of Mexico, and Oaxaca. The interviewees were selected using the snowball method and other eligibility criteria such as education, age, and gender.

resultsFindings suggest that social capital is a relevant factor in solving healthcare problems, depending on the level of marginalization. The role of social capital can be explained by the precariousness of medical service delivery, the poor health infrastructure, and the difficult access to health care in Mexico. Networks are the main resource to deal with health related issues, food, medicine, and out-of-the-pocket medical expenses in contexts of high levels of marginalization. In the middle level of marginalization, networks also help in raising funds for more-specialized medical services and higher quality hospitals. In the least-marginalized levels, social capital is used as companionship for sick individuals, while support networks act as emotional relief. At this level, most individuals have private health insurance, and many of them have major medical healthcare coverage.

conclusionsParticipants reported low levels of trust in the health care system because of the poor infrastructure and quality of medical service delivery. Although the main criticism is focused on public healthcare institutions, there is a lack of trust in private medical services as well. These facts are related to the access and quality of medical service delivery and turn social capital into a significant asset. Despite that social bonds or links are valuable resources that individuals can use to solve healthcare related issues, the use of social capital is not homogenous. Indeed, it can be influenced by several factors that were represented in this study through the municipal marginalization index.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityInsurance, HealthSocial CapitalVulnerable PopulationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth ServicesHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchMarginalizationMexicoQualitative methodSocial capitalSupport networks

Identifiers

PMID32041618
PMCPMC7011273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.