Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041590›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

High detection rate of osteoporosis with screening of a general hospitalized population: a 6-year study in 6406 patients in a university hospital setting.

Olivier Malaise, Marie Detroz, Mathieu Leroy, Lorenzo Leonori, Laurence Seidel, Michel G Malaise

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis in type 1 diabetes-results from an observational study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivier MalaiseDepartments of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège University, Liège, Belgium. olivier.malaise@chuliege.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2799-2949
Marie DetrozDepartments of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6360-0551
Mathieu LeroyDepartments of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8707-3311
Lorenzo LeonoriDepartments of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1449-1803
Laurence SeidelDepartments of Biostatistics, University Hospital of Liège, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2733-269X
Michel G MalaiseDepartments of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-2867
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis is a highly prevalent disease identified by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) that can be performed in an ambulatory (out-patient) or hospitalized population. We evaluated the use of baseline in-hospital DEXA screening to identify osteoporosis in ambulatory care and hospitalized patients; we also assessed specific risk factors for osteoporosis among these populations.

methodsWe included a baseline initial DEXA from 6406 consecutive patients at our tertiary referral University Hospital.

resultsOsteoporosis was diagnosed in 22.3% of the study population. In univariate analysis, osteoporosis risk factors were age, fracture history and low BMI (for all 3 sites), but also corticotherapy (lumbar spine and femoral neck) and male (lumbar spine). In multivariate analysis, age, fracture history, low BMI, and male increased osteoporosis risk. In-hospital screening yielded a higher percentage of osteoporosis positive scans than ambulatory care screening (31.8% vs 18.5%, p < 0.001). In-hospital screening targeted an older and more predominantly male population with a higher fracture history. Z-scores revealed that this difference was not only due to an older age of the population and mainly concerned cortical bone.

conclusionsIn-hospital osteoporosis screening revealed more osteoporosis than screening in ambulatory practice and could be an additional tool to improve the identification and management of osteoporosis. In addition to typical risk factors, we identified male gender as associated with osteoporosis detection in our cohort.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareBelgiumFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisRetrospective StudiesDual energy X-ray absorptiometryHospitalizationMaleOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID32041590
PMCPMC7011267
OpenAlexW3010995208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.