Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041588›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2020

Pilot study of the influence of self-coding on empathy within an introductory motivational interviewing training.

Trevor Simper, Jon Agley, Mallori DeSalle, Jennifer Todd, Tapati Dutta

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Trevor SimperSmall Changes Healthcare, Perth, Western Australia.
Jon AgleyPrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, 501 N. Morton St., Suite 110, Bloomington, IN, 47404, USA. jagley@indiana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8850
Mallori DeSallePrevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, 501 N. Morton St., Suite 110, Bloomington, IN, 47404, USA.
Jennifer ToddDepartment of Social Work, College of Health and Human Services, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, USA.
Tapati DuttaHealth Sciences Department, Fort Lewis College, Durango, CO, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USFort Lewis College · USIndiana State University · US

Funding

CSAT SAMHSA HHS TI025977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotivational interviewing (MI) is a framework for addressing behavior change that is often used by healthcare professionals. Expression of empathy during MI is associated with positive client outcomes, while absence of empathy may produce iatrogenic effects. Although training in MI is linked to increased therapeutic empathy in learners, no research has investigated individual training components' contribution to this increase. The objective of this study was to test whether a self-coding MI exercise using smartphones completed at hour 6 of an 8-h MI training was superior in engendering empathy to training as usual (watching an MI expert perform in a video clip for the same duration at the same point in the training).

methodsThis was a pilot study at two sites using randomization and control groups with 1:1 allocation. Allocation was achieved via computerized assignment (site 1, United Kingdom) or facedown playing card distribution (site 2, United States). Participants were 58 students attending a university class at one of two universities, of which an 8-h segment was dedicated to a standardized MI training. Fifty-five students consented to participate and were randomized. The intervention was an MI self-coding exercise using smartphone recording and a standardized scoring sheet. Students were encouraged to reflect on areas of potential improvement based on their self-coding results. The main outcome measure was score on the Helpful Responses Questionnaire, a measure of therapeutic empathy, collected prior to and immediately following the 8-h training. Questionnaire coding was completed by 2 blinded external reviewers and assessed for interrater reliability, and students were assigned averaged empathy scores from 6 to 30. Analyses were conducted via repeated-measures ANOVA using the general linear model.

resultsFifty-five students were randomized, and 2 were subsequently excluded from analysis at site 2 due to incomplete questionnaires. The study itself was feasible, and overall therapeutic empathy increased significantly and substantially among students. However, the intervention was not superior to the control condition in this study.

conclusionsReplacing a single passive learning exercise with an active learning exercise in an MI training did not result in a substantive boost to therapeutic empathy. However, consistently with prior research, this study identified significant overall increases in empathy following introductory MI training. A much larger study examining the impact of selected exercises and approaches would likely be useful and informative.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateEmpathyMotivational InterviewingSelf-AssessmentHumansPilot ProjectsProblem-Based LearningReproducibility of ResultsSmartphoneSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomUnited StatesEducationEmpathyHealth professionalsMIMotivational interviewing

Identifiers

PMID32041588
PMCPMC7011448
OpenAlexW3008535475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.