Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041544›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

QTL mapping of yield component traits on bin map generated from resequencing a RIL population of foxtail millet (Setaria italica).

Tianpeng Liu, Jihong He, Kongjun Dong, Xuewen Wang, Wenwen Wang, Peng Yang, Ruiyu Ren, Lei Zhang, Zhengsheng Zhang, Tianyu Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic linkage map construction and QTL mapping for panicle-related traits in foxtail millet (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Improvement of millets in the post-genomic era.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Multi-omics intervention inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Fine mapping ofMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tianpeng LiuCrop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Jihong HeCrop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Kongjun DongCrop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Xuewen WangDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, 120 Green Str, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Wenwen WangCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, People's Republic of China.
Peng YangCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, People's Republic of China.
Ruiyu RenCrop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Lei ZhangCrop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Zhengsheng ZhangCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, People's Republic of China. zhangzs@swu.edu.cn.
Tianyu YangCrop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, People's Republic of China. 13519638111@163.com.
Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouthwest University · CNUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-06-13.5-A9Innovation Team Project of Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2017Major Science and Technology Special Project of Gansu Province 18ZD2NA008-1Natural Science Foundation of China 31760391, 31560094Special Crop Industry Technology System of Gansu Province 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoxtail millet (Setaria italica) has been developed into a model genetical system for deciphering architectural evolution, C

resultsHere, 164 Recombinant inbreed lines from a cross between Longgu7 and Yugu1 were created and 1,047,978 SNPs were identified between both parents via resequencing. A total of 3413 bin markers developed from SNPs were used to construct a binary map, containing 3963 recombinant breakpoints and totaling 1222.26 cM with an average distance of 0.36 cM between adjacent markers. Forty-seven QTLs were identified for four traits of straw weight, panicle weight, grain weight per plant and 1000-grain weight. These QTLs explained 5.5-14.7% of phenotypic variance. Thirty-nine favorable QTL alleles were found to inherit from Yugu1. Three stable QTLs were detected in multi-environments, and nine QTL clusters were identified on Chromosome 3, 6, 7 and 9.

conclusionsA high-density genetic map with 3413 bin markers was constructed and three stable QTLs and 9 QTL clusters for yield component traits were identified. The results laid a powerful foundation for fine mapping, identifying candidate genes, elaborating molecular mechanisms and application in foxtail millet breeding programs by marker-assisted selection.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingQuantitative Trait LociChromosome SegregationEdible GrainGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInbreedingPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSetaria PlantGenetic MarkersBin mapFoxtail millet (Setaria italica)QTLSNPYield component traits

Identifiers

PMID32041544
PMCPMC7011527
OpenAlexW3011329963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.