Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041359›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Data-Driven Bias Correction and Defect Diagnosis Model for In-Service Vehicle Acceleration Measurements.

Lei Bai, Rengkui Liu, Qing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei BaiState Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety; School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Rengkui LiuState Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety; School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Qing LiBeijing National Railway Research & Design Institute of Signal & Communication Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, China.

Funding

Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation ZZ2019-116National Natural Science Foundation of China 51578057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Track quality instruments use low-cost accelerometers placed on or attached to the floors of operating trains, and these instruments collect substantial amounts of data over short inspection periods. The measurements collected by the instruments are the main data source for track irregularity evaluation. However, considerable measurement bias exists in the vertical and lateral vibration data obtained from such instruments. False positive track vibration defects detected by track quality instruments occur frequently. This results in considerable time and effort being expended needlessly because maintenance workers have to visit the railway track sites to check and review the track vibration defects. Therefore, we propose a model for data-driven bias correction and defect diagnosis for in-service vehicle acceleration measurements based on track degradation characteristics. Substantial amounts of historical track measurement data from different inspection methods were mined extensively to eliminate the false positive detection of track vibration defects and diagnose the causes of track vibration defects. Actual measurement data from the Lanxin Railway were used to validate our proposed model. The success rate achieved in identifying false positive track vibration defects was 84.1%, and that in track vibration defect diagnosis was 75.8%. These high success rates suggest that the proposed model can be of practical use in improving railway track maintenance management.

Indexed as

bias correctiondata-driven modeldefect diagnosisin-service vehicle acceleration measurementrailway track

Identifiers

PMID32041359
PMCPMC7039385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.