Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041299›Full record

ReviewViruses2020

Advantages and Prospects of Tag/Catcher Mediated Antigen Display on Capsid-Like Particle-Based Vaccines.

Kara-Lee Aves, Louise Goksøyr, Adam F Sander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Virus-like Particle-Based F4 EnterotoxigenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Virus-like Particle (VLP) Vaccines for Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A Review of Virus-Like Particle-Based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Clinical Trial Phases.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Current Status of COVID-19 Vaccines.Frontiers in genome editing · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kara-Lee AvesFaculty of Health Science, Institute for Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Louise GoksøyrFaculty of Health Science, Institute for Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adam F SanderFaculty of Health Science, Institute for Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capsid-like particles (CLPs) are multimeric, repetitive assemblies of recombinant viral capsid proteins, which are highly immunogenic due to their structural similarity to wild-type viruses. CLPs can be used as molecular scaffolds to enable the presentation of soluble vaccine antigens in a similar structural format, which can significantly increase the immunogenicity of the antigen. CLP-based antigen display can be obtained by various genetic and modular conjugation methods. However, these vary in their versatility as well as efficiency in achieving an immunogenic antigen display. Here, we make a comparative review of the major CLP-based antigen display technologies. The Tag/Catcher-AP205 platform is highlighted as a particularly versatile and efficient technology that offers new qualitative and practical advantages in designing modular CLP vaccines. Finally, we discuss how split-protein Tag/Catcher conjugation systems can help to further propagate and enhance modular CLP vaccine designs.

Indexed as

Vaccines, Virus-Like ParticleAntigens, ViralCapsidCapsid ProteinsViral VaccinesAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleViral Vaccinescapsid, antigen display, virus-like particle, vaccine, platform

Identifiers

PMID32041299
PMCPMC7077247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.