Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041143›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Size, Surface Functionalization, and Genotoxicity of Gold Nanoparticles In Vitro.

Gerard Vales, Satu Suhonen, Kirsi M Siivola, Kai M Savolainen, Julia Catalán, Hannu Norppa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genotoxicity of nanoparticles evaluated using theJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerard ValesFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Työterveyslaitos, 00032 Helsinki, Finland.
Satu SuhonenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Työterveyslaitos, 00032 Helsinki, Finland.
Kirsi M SiivolaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Työterveyslaitos, 00032 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8161-3308
Kai M SavolainenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Työterveyslaitos, 00032 Helsinki, Finland.
Julia CatalánFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Työterveyslaitos, 00032 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2936-242X
Hannu NorppaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Työterveyslaitos, 00032 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-904X
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

FP7-NMP 309329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies suggested that gold nanoparticles (NPs) could be genotoxic in vitro and in vivo. However, gold NPs currently produced present a wide range of sizes and functionalization, which could affect their interactions with the environment or with biological structures and, thus, modify their toxic effects. In this study, we investigated the role of surface charge in determining the genotoxic potential of gold NPs, as measured by the induction of DNA damage (comet assay) and chromosomal damage (micronucleus assay) in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells. The cellular uptake of gold NPs was assessed by hyperspectral imaging. Two core sizes (~5 nm and ~20 nm) and three functionalizations representing negative (carboxylate), positive (ammonium), and neutral (poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)ylated) surface charges were examined. Cationic ammonium gold NPs were clearly more cytotoxic than their anionic and neutral counterparts, but genotoxicity was not simply dependent on functionalization or size, since DNA damage was induced by 20-nm ammonium and PEGylated gold NPs, while micronucleus induction was increased by 5-nm ammonium and 20-nm PEGylated gold NPs. The 5-nm carboxylated gold NPs were not genotoxic, and evidence on the genotoxicity of the 20-nm carboxylated gold NPs was restricted to a positive result at the lowest dose in the micronucleus assay. When interpreting the results, it has to be taken into account that cytotoxicity limited the doses available for the ammonium-functionalized gold NPs and that gold NPs were earlier described to interfere with the comet assay procedure, possibly resulting in a false positive result. In conclusion, our findings show that the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold NPs are clearly enhanced by positive surface charge, but neither functionalization nor size can single-handedly account for the genotoxic effects of the gold NPs.

Indexed as

BEAS-2Bcellular uptakeDNA damagefunctionalizationgenotoxicitygold nanoparticlehyperspectral microscopyin vitromicronucleusparticle size

Identifiers

PMID32041143
PMCPMC7075117
OpenAlexW3005475556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.