Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32041088›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2020

Harnessing the Potential of Stem Cells for Disease Modeling: Progress and Promises.

Chiara Argentati, Ilaria Tortorella, Martina Bazzucchi, Francesco Morena, Sabata Martino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Novel Nanostructured Scaffolds of Poly(butyleneNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Indoxyl sulfate impairsExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in livestock.World journal of stem cells · 2021
    Review
  13. [Human cells for therapeutics purpose: State of the art].Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara ArgentatiDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, Via del Giochetto, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Ilaria TortorellaDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, Via del Giochetto, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Martina BazzucchiDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, Via del Giochetto, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Francesco MorenaDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, Via del Giochetto, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Sabata MartinoDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Perugia, Via del Giochetto, 06126 Perugia, Italy.

Funding

ANDROGEN REGULATION OF HUMAN SEBACEOUS GLANDSK08AR002018 · NIAMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THIBOUTOT, DIANE M. · 1997 to 2001
$225k
Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca FFABRMARTINO-2018Università degli Studi di Perugia Fondo Ricerca di Base 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ex vivo cell/tissue-based models are an essential step in the workflow of pathophysiology studies, assay development, disease modeling, drug discovery, and development of personalized therapeutic strategies. For these purposes, both scientific and pharmaceutical research have adopted ex vivo stem cell models because of their better predictive power. As matter of a fact, the advancing in isolation and in vitro expansion protocols for culturing autologous human stem cells, and the standardization of methods for generating patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells has made feasible to generate and investigate human cellular disease models with even greater speed and efficiency. Furthermore, the potential of stem cells on generating more complex systems, such as scaffold-cell models, organoids, or organ-on-a-chip, allowed to overcome the limitations of the two-dimensional culture systems as well as to better mimic tissues structures and functions. Finally, the advent of genome-editing/gene therapy technologies had a great impact on the generation of more proficient stem cell-disease models and on establishing an effective therapeutic treatment. In this review, we discuss important breakthroughs of stem cell-based models highlighting current directions, advantages, and limitations and point out the need to combine experimental biology with computational tools able to describe complex biological systems and deliver results or predictions in the context of personalized medicine.

Indexed as

computational cell modelinggene therapygenome editingiPSCsorganoidsorgan-on-a-chiptissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32041088
PMCPMC7151621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.