Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040935›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2020

Toward an Integrative Psychometric Model of Emotions.

Jens Lange, Jonas Dalege, Denny Borsboom, Gerben A van Kleef, Agneta H Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Modelling nonlinear moderation effects with local structural equation modelling (LSEM): A non-technical introduction.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Emotional recognition technologies applied to health: review and challenges.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Piecing together the puzzle of emotional consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023
    Review
  20. The Sustainable Development Goals Psychological Inventory: A Network Analysis in Italian University Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jens LangePsychology Research Institute, University of Amsterdam.ORCID 0000-0002-5375-3247
Jonas DalegePsychology Research Institute, University of Amsterdam.
Denny BorsboomPsychology Research Institute, University of Amsterdam.
Gerben A van KleefPsychology Research Institute, University of Amsterdam.
Agneta H FischerPsychology Research Institute, University of Amsterdam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions are part and parcel of the human condition, but their nature is debated. Three broad classes of theories about the nature of emotions can be distinguished: affect-program theories, constructionist theories, and appraisal theories. Integrating these broad classes of theories into a unifying theory is challenging. An integrative psychometric model of emotions can inform such a theory because psychometric models are intertwined with theoretical perspectives about constructs. To identify an integrative psychometric model, we delineate properties of emotions stated by emotion theories and investigate whether psychometric models account for these properties. Specifically, an integrative psychometric model of emotions should allow (a) identifying distinct emotions (central in affect-program theories), (b) between- and within-person variations of emotions (central in constructionist theories), and (c) causal relationships between emotion components (central in appraisal theories). Evidence suggests that the popular reflective and formative latent variable models-in which emotions are conceptualized as unobservable causes or consequences of emotion components-cannot account for all properties. Conversely, a psychometric network model-in which emotions are conceptualized as systems of causally interacting emotion components-accounts for all properties. The psychometric network model thus constitutes an integrative psychometric model of emotions, facilitating progress toward a unifying theory.

Indexed as

EmotionsModels, PsychologicalPsychological TheoryPsychometricsHumansemotionformative latent-variable modelpsychometric network modelreflective latent-variable model

Identifiers

PMID32040935
PMCPMC7059206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.